The Soviet Union and the Russians have used m/s in their surface weather 
reports for decades.  m/s has been used worldwide in weather data system at 
least since the 1940s.  Airlines and others have converted to knots, miles per 
hour and km/h from m/s.  m/s is the international standard in weather observing 
systems.
    Stan Doore

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Potts 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:37 PM
  Subject: [USMA:41171] RE: Wind speed m/s


  Pat:

  The article looks good.

  Of course, if one doesn't need to assess the energy involved, there's no need 
to visualize an arbitrary volume, or indeed any volume. I simply visualize 
whatever is blowing on my face arriving at whatever point within the current 
scope of my vision I think it will reach in one second. I then make a rough 
estimate of the distance to that point. 

  In the case of a weather report, where the wind velocity is already provided, 
I don't necessarily have to know how it will feel on my face. I can visualize 
leaves or dust or something else blowing along the street at that velocity. Of 
course, I could also use that same visualization for when the wind is actually 
blowing on my face.

  Your wind-speed categories are interesting, making your article a good 
reference. However, for the purposes of a simple explanation, there may be too 
much information there.

  By the way, I've never seen Rear Admiral hyphenated before. I don't know 
about Australian spelling conventions, but in US English, service ranks aren't 
hyphenated. The last two times I was in Australia, I thought about buying an 
Aussie dictionary, but simply never got around to it. An actual substantive 
problem, though, is your use of Roman type for the formulas. To distinguish 
them from units, variables should be italicized (e.g., E = 0.5·mv² or E = 
mv²/2). (I know you know that, so I assume it's an oversight.)

  Best regards,

  Bill



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Naughtin
    Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 04:03
    To: U.S. Metric Association
    Cc: U.S. Metric Association
    Subject: [USMA:41166] Wind speed m/s


    On 2008/06/16, at 3:45 AM, Bill Potts wrote:


      Now, for wind speed, m/s makes eminent sense. There, we're dealing with
      whether or not something can be visualized.


    Dear Bill, 


    Thanks for this suggestion. It really stated me thinking.


    My first thought was about the ability of your imagination to visualise an 
invisible substance such air in an invisible form such as wind.


    However, to continue your theme of 'something can be visualized', I have 
begun the attached article with these two sentences:


    I want you to share a thought experiment with me.

    Visualise a cubic metre of air. 

Reply via email to