Not only is 10 000 m a round figure, but it is one of the standard Olympic
distances (unlike 500 m!).

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Trusten
Sent: 04 July 2008 14:33
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:41321] Re: Fw: The July 4th 10 kilometer race

 

Letters to the media on U.S. metrication should be both respectful of, and
informative to, the recipient.  

 

First, praise the insitution for its virtues; I sense that the publication
or broadcast has value or one would not be reading or observing it.  Start
out by pointing  out its good qualities. 

 

Then, give the recipient a perspective on U.S. metrication, something it, or
he/she/they, may not have.  The purpose of the letter should be to educate,
but not to lecture. However, when you educate, educate well.  You don't have
to be bashful about giving the facts. 

 

 I would have written the 10 km letter as follows:

 

Dear AJC ---.

 

Thank you for your excellent preview of the city's annual Peachtree Road
Race.  The maps and story were very helpful to me in following the unfolding
event. 

 

However, I am puzzled by your insistence upon describing the race as a 6.2
mile contest.  Instead of reporting what appears to be a random number of
miles of the race's length, you should have stated it as what it really is:
namely,  an even 10 km or 10,000 m. The race is designed to be a round,
standard length in units of the metric system. 

 

Besides being widely used for athletics in all nations, including the United
States, the metric system is also the legally preferred system of
measurement for U.S. trade and commerce (Metric Conversion Act of 1975, as
amended 1988).  I think it would be useful for you to concentrate upon
reporting in the metric system whenever possible.  This approach would add
to the expertness you already show, and particularly starting in this
Olympic year, because all nations (except the U.S.) participating in the
games use and understand only the metric standard.  

 

Thank you again for your otherwise fine story.

 

SI-ncerely,

 

etc.

 

 

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Jon Saxton <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  

To: U.S. Metric <mailto:[email protected]>  Association 

Sent: 05 July, 2008 06:56

Subject: [USMA:41319] Re: Fw: The July 4th 10 kilometer race

 

Norm:

After thinking about your concerns for a moment, I wonder if a slightly
different approach might be more effective.

Dear <reporter>:

Why do you and most of your colleagues in journalism feel compelled to
convert every metric measurement into old British colonial equivalents for
us?  Do you think we are so out of touch with the world that we have to be
treated like 19th century children?  I find it really irritating when you
describe 10 km as 6.2 miles.  We are exposed to the metric system quite a
lot and we don't need to have everything "dumbed down" for us.  It seems so
patronizing, unnecessary and almost insulting.

Please treat us like 21st century adults.

Regards
<sender>



Norman & Nancy Werling wrote: 

USMA members,

 

I tried to make nice with this missive to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution
about tomorrow's 10 km race, but I'm not sure I succeeded.

 

Norm

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Norman  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> & Nancy Werling 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 23:35

Subject: The July 4th 10 kilometer race

 

Dear AJC reporter Mr. Scott Bernade,

 

I'm going to give you credit for realizing that the race in more than 6.2
miles because at least Wednesday's sports section headline said: "6.2 Miles,
Plus."

 

I'll assume it was your editors that were at fault for not allowing you to
simply and correctly refer to it as 10 kilometers.   Perhaps next time, your
editors will allow you to refer to it as a 10,000 meter race.  Surely you
agree that the public, which follows Olympic competition, is aware of track
events in meters.  However, I would be loath to think that the Atlanta
public does not realize that the prefix "kilo" means a thousand.  Thus 10
kilo(thousand)meters is 10,000 meters.

 

I would be truly interested in knowing if the serious runners from other
countries practice and gauge their running on one kilometer (1000 meter)
intervals, as I assume that 95% of the world would do, rather than the one
mile (5280 feet) measures, as only the US persists in doing.

 

Norman Werling

Stone Mountain, GA 30083

 

Reply via email to