Stan:
 
I was referring to the following sentence:

The shorthand is an easily-remembered substitute such as "u" that should change 
to μ; r. to · (raised dot); om to Ω; Nm to N·m; d to ° (degree). 

You appear to be suggesting that one type a u in quotes ("u") in order to get a 
mu (µ). It's quicker to put it between hyphens (-u-), as that doesn't involve 
using the shift key.
 
Bill 
  _____  

Bill Potts
W <http://wfpconsulting.com/> FP Consulting
Roseville, CA
 <http://metric1.org/> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 


  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Jakuba
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 04:16
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:41460] RE: SI symbols typing


Bill:
Good of you to comment. I am not sure I understand what you mean by using 
enclosing quotes as part of the sequence to be replaced by auto-correction. 
Please explain.
 
As to the convenience of the MSWord Autocorrect feature, I find it quicker and 
easier to use once set as I wrote than ASCII or any other method. My writing 
was intended to show how to do it, not to persuade. However, typing m3 that 
changes automatically to m³, u to µ, etc. requires the least amount of strikes 
of any method.
 
Over the years I noticed that one or two of my selected shortcuts have the flaw 
you mentioned. Some I changed and others I never did having been too used to 
the quirk to bather with finding a better shortcut.
 
It took me and a friend a while to figure out the described method (some 20 
years ago - it was then published in Metric Today). Since, it saved me tons 
(metric!) of time in writing the many  letters, reports, manuals and training 
material in SI. The only problem (and it is not specific to Autocorrect) has 
been the need to modify the method as necessitated by the MSWord updates.  
Stan Jakuba

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bill  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Potts 
To: U.S. Metric Association <mailto:[email protected]>  
Sent: 08 Jul 19, Saturday 14:25
Subject: [USMA:41450] RE: SI symbols typing

Stan:
 
I'm not sure I like the idea of using enclosing quotes as part of the sequence 
to be replaced by auto-correction.
 
I use auto-correction myself (in MS Word 2003) for a number of things. For 
example, to create an em-dash, I type -em-. For an en-dash, I type -en-.
 
The point about those is that short sequences enclosed by hyphens don't 
normally appear in text, meaning that one is therefore unlikely to get an 
unwanted auto-correction.
 
Using the same logic, one could use -mu- to create a µ. As the omega is always 
used as the symbol for ohm, the sequence to create it would be -ohm-. 
Superscripted 2's and 3's can similarly be -2- and -3-. Bear in mind, in those 
two cases, that most fonts already include a superscripted 2 and 3. Thus, they 
don't require that one use the superscript font property on an ordinary 2 or 3. 
For this reason, I see no need to create special cases for square meters and 
cubic meters.
 
Of course, I do most of the special characters by the use of the US 
International keyboard layout. For µ, I simply type Ctrl+Alt+m. For ² and ³, I 
type Ctrl+Alt+2 and Ctrl+Alt+3, respectively. If I want to talk about the 
famous Swedish scientist, Ångstrom, and his now-deprecated unit, ångstrom, I 
use Ctrl+Alt+Shift+w for the first letter of his name and Ctrl+Alt+w for the 
first letter of the unit.
 
Best regards,
 
Bill 



  _____  

Bill Potts
W <http://wfpconsulting.com/> FP Consulting
Roseville, CA
 <http://metric1.org/> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 


  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Jakuba
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 09:46
To: U.S. Metric Association; SCC14 IEEE
Subject: SI symbols typing


Complementing the attachment "SI Writing Rules" I sent last week, I am 
forwarding the method for typing SI symbols via the Autocorrect feature of the 
MSWord. 
 
The method may look cumbersome, but after you set one of the shortcuts, 
repeating the procedure a dozen times for all the symbols you often use is a 
breeze and the benefit of the effort lasts forever.
 
Not having tried the latest MSWord and Vista, I am curious to know whether 
those can be set up the same or an easier way or needs no setup at all. 
Stan Jakuba

Reply via email to