For everybody - thanks to Bill, the sentence now reads
 "........ such as the character u that shows as μ ......" 
I appreciate any such suggestions.

Concerning the selection of the substitutes that avoids the unwanted 
autocorrections, there seems to be enough single letters in English that never 
stand alone such as the u, or short combinations such as the r. to minimize 
that potential problem. 

Again, it is just one among many ways how to speed up one's typing. 
Stan Jakuba
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Potts 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: 08 Jul 22, Tuesday 15:29
  Subject: [USMA:41477] RE: Fw: RE: SI symbols typing


  Stan:

  The misunderstanding arose because you didn't use quotes to distinguish the 
four other examples in the same sentence. I would have added a note to that 
effect, but thought it was something you'd realize from my comment. (And don't 
forget that om is a monotonous Buddhist chant -- sounded as 
ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... ).

  As for converting a u (rather than, for example, something like -mu- or -m-) 
to µ, my personal preference is to avoid automatic substitutions on single 
letters. I'm perfectly happy, though, if others disagree about that. In the 
meantime, I continue to use Ctrl+Alt+m.

  Incidentally, I've removed the parenthetical c from my own auto-correct list. 
It's annoying, when I really want a parenthetical c, to have it converted to 
the copyright symbol ©, which I get (when I actually want it) by typing 
Ctrl+Alt+c.

  I don't need to try the shortcuts. As a professional writer (and MS Word user 
since its introduction), I'm already familiar with the process -- hence the 
examples I gave.

  Best regards,

  Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Bill Potts
  WFP Consulting
  Roseville, CA
  http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Jakuba
    Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 05:48
    To: U.S. Metric Association
    Subject: [USMA:41470] Fw: RE: SI symbols typing


    Bill:
    Apparently you did not try the procedure. It would have been obvious then 
that the quotes were intended to distinguish the u from the other text only. 
Nevertheless, if you got confused, I will take the quotes out in the next 
sending a few years from now. Hopefully that move will not generate an opposite 
reaction 
    Stan
    PS: You have a good eye. Thousands had seen the text and noone pointed this 
out. Will you try the method now? Do it. It will save time.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Bill Potts 
      To: U.S. Metric Association 
      Sent: 08 Jul 21, Monday 11:27
      Subject: [USMA:41465] RE: SI symbols typing


      Stan:

      I was referring to the following sentence:
        The shorthand is an easily-remembered substitute such as "u" that 
should change to μ; r. to · (raised dot); om to Ω; Nm to N·m; d to ° (degree). 
      You appear to be suggesting that one type a u in quotes ("u") in order to 
get a mu (µ). It's quicker to put it between hyphens (-u-), as that doesn't 
involve using the shift key.

      Bill 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Bill Potts
      WFP Consulting
      Roseville, CA
      http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan 
Jakuba
        Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 04:16
        To: U.S. Metric Association
        Subject: [USMA:41460] RE: SI symbols typing


        Bill:
        Good of you to comment. I am not sure I understand what you mean by 
using enclosing quotes as part of the sequence to be replaced by 
auto-correction. Please explain.

        As to the convenience of the MSWord Autocorrect feature, I find it 
quicker and easier to use once set as I wrote than ASCII or any other method. 
My writing was intended to show how to do it, not to persuade. However, typing 
m3 that changes automatically to m³, u to µ, etc. requires the least amount of 
strikes of any method.

        Over the years I noticed that one or two of my selected shortcuts have 
the flaw you mentioned. Some I changed and others I never did having been too 
used to the quirk to bather with finding a better shortcut.

        It took me and a friend a while to figure out the described method 
(some 20 years ago - it was then published in Metric Today). Since, it saved me 
tons (metric!) of time in writing the many  letters, reports, manuals and 
training material in SI. The only problem (and it is not specific to 
Autocorrect) has been the need to modify the method as necessitated by the 
MSWord updates.  
        Stan Jakuba
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Bill Potts 
          To: U.S. Metric Association 
          Sent: 08 Jul 19, Saturday 14:25
          Subject: [USMA:41450] RE: SI symbols typing


          Stan:

          I'm not sure I like the idea of using enclosing quotes as part of the 
sequence to be replaced by auto-correction.

          I use auto-correction myself (in MS Word 2003) for a number of 
things. For example, to create an em-dash, I type -em-. For an en-dash, I type 
-en-.

          The point about those is that short sequences enclosed by hyphens 
don't normally appear in text, meaning that one is therefore unlikely to get an 
unwanted auto-correction.

          Using the same logic, one could use -mu- to create a µ. As the omega 
is always used as the symbol for ohm, the sequence to create it would be -ohm-. 
Superscripted 2's and 3's can similarly be -2- and -3-. Bear in mind, in those 
two cases, that most fonts already include a superscripted 2 and 3. Thus, they 
don't require that one use the superscript font property on an ordinary 2 or 3. 
For this reason, I see no need to create special cases for square meters and 
cubic meters.

          Of course, I do most of the special characters by the use of the US 
International keyboard layout. For µ, I simply type Ctrl+Alt+m. For ² and ³, I 
type Ctrl+Alt+2 and Ctrl+Alt+3, respectively. If I want to talk about the 
famous Swedish scientist, Ångstrom, and his now-deprecated unit, ångstrom, I 
use Ctrl+Alt+Shift+w for the first letter of his name and Ctrl+Alt+w for the 
first letter of the unit.

          Best regards,

          Bill 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

          Bill Potts
          WFP Consulting
          Roseville, CA
          http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 



--------------------------------------------------------------------
            From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan 
Jakuba
            Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 09:46
            To: U.S. Metric Association; SCC14 IEEE
            Subject: SI symbols typing


            Complementing the attachment "SI Writing Rules" I sent last week, I 
am forwarding the method for typing SI symbols via the Autocorrect feature of 
the MSWord. 

            The method may look cumbersome, but after you set one of the 
shortcuts, repeating the procedure a dozen times for all the symbols you often 
use is a breeze and the benefit of the effort lasts forever.

            Not having tried the latest MSWord and Vista, I am curious to know 
whether those can be set up the same or an easier way or needs no setup at all. 
            Stan Jakuba

Reply via email to