On 2008/08/08, at 8:17 PM, Nat Hager III wrote:
I don’t want to get into the partisan debate <off-topic> but the stupidity debate has a lot to do with slow metrication…..

Nat

What I mean, instead, is that know-nothingism — the insistence that there are simple, brute-force, instant-gratification answers to every problem, and that there’s something effeminate and weak about anyone who suggests otherwise…………de facto slogan has become: “Real men don’t think things through.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/08/opinion/08krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin


Dear Nat and All,

You don't have to have slow metrication. Metrication can be fast, smooth, and so economical that you make additional profits following the metrication process.

The methods to use for fast metrication have been demonstrated time and time again in many places in the world. I have described the various paths to metrication in the article 'Approaches to metrication' that you will find at http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/ApproachesToMetrication.pdf

Essentially, the techniques you need to go so slowly toward metrication can be summarised as:

1       Encourage the idea and practice of metric conversion.

2 Use a mix of fractions (both common or vulgar and decimal fractions) rather than using the metric prefixes to favor whole numbers.

3 Don't establish a metrication policy for your self, your family, your work group, your company, your industry. or your nation.

4 Where possible build a choice into your metrication policy such as baby mass can be either grams or kilograms or human height can be in millimetres, centimetres, or metres. The argument 'but don't they know they just have to move the decimal point' doesn't cut it in a world where many people are essentially innumerate.

5 Encourage the idea that the metric system is foreign (deny that the metric system was invented in England and that the decimal nature of the metric system was in large part driven by Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington)

6 Encourage the use of centimetres -- although these are a legal part of the initial (1790s) metric system, these have always been shown to slow metrication processes dramatically.

7 Encourage the use of 'hidden metric'. Develop processes to lie about when you actually use the metric system because of it ease of use and accuracy. Don't tell anyone. Develop a veneer of untruths to communicate with the public. Use the motor industry, the computer industry, and NASA as your examples.

8 Dumb down metric measures whenever and wherever you can. If someone asks, 'What's that in pounds?' do the calculation and then tell them the dumbed down conversion so that they can maintain their silly mind- set for another generation (or two if they pass on this silliness to their children).

9 Don't give rules of thumb such as 'your little finger is about 10 millimetres across if you are female and the fingernail is about 10 millimetres across if you are male'.

10 Don't ever let anyone know that most companies, industries, and nations save money from the metrication process. Maintain the lie that metrication costs money.

These are not in any order, they are just the first 10 that came to mind when I thought about your comment on stupidity and slow metrication. You will find supporting articles on most of these issues at http://www.metricationmatters.com/articles/ where probably the most important are:

http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/MetricConversion.pdf
http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/centimetresORmillimetres.pdf
http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/CostOfNonMetrication.pdf
http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/WholeNumberRule.pdf

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com/ for more metrication information, contact Pat at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to get the free 'Metrication matters' newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter/ to subscribe.

Reply via email to