This phenomenon has been described in many places, three of which are here -
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/05/05/0_is_the_new_8/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_standard_clothing_size http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanity_sizing Carleton From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of STANLEY DOORE Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 19:53 To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:42577] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the US aimed at immigrants? Beats me! They've been playing around with these metric sizes for at least 20 years. Women's sizes are a particular problem since they want to show smaller sizes than they really are. to make them appear smaller than they really are. It's a vanity issue. Stan Doore ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeremiah MacGregor <mailto:[email protected]> To: U.S. Metric <mailto:[email protected]> Association Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 1:06 PM Subject: [USMA:42449] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the US aimed at immigrants? Stan, When will they be adopted? Does anyone know? Will it be used worldwide? Jerry _____ From: STANLEY DOORE <[email protected]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:38:44 PM Subject: [USMA:42406] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the US aimed at immigrants? Martin et al: You are correct that hat sizes, height, and other body dimensions etc. are in cm or m for the rest of the world. The US uses inches for these and follows the same principle only the US uses hat size in fractions of inches. Clothing and body size dimensions standards have been proposed, however, these have not been adopted yet. Standardizing on millimeters for all body dimensions and clothing would be very straight forward and would be less complex. Stan Doore ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Vlietstra" <[email protected]> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:05 PM Subject: [USMA:42405] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the US aimed at immigrants? > > On the other hand, using centimeters consistently for the human body would > make for compatibility with the rest of the world. Please visit > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EN_13402 for a description of the European EN > 13402 standard. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of STANLEY DOORE > Sent: 22 January 2009 14:26 > To: U.S. Metric Association > Subject: [USMA:42403] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the US > aimed at immigrants? > > > Hi Bill et al: > > My suggestion to use millimeter (mm) focuses on human measurements. It > avoids decimal points and a mixture of scaling by using whole numbers, and > handling them in writing and in computers (packed decimal rather than > floating point). Using only mm for human measurements eliminates thinking > about different units m, dm cm and mm and associated conversions. > Computations, therefore, can be direct without conversion. > > Stan Doore > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Potts" <[email protected]> > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 4:39 PM > Subject: [USMA:42395] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the US > aimed at immigrants? > > >> >> Stan: >> >> What's this nonsense about "you are dealing only with one unit (mm) and >> not >> m and cm)"? When I give my height as 1.83 m, there is only one unit -- >> the >> meter. >> >> Also, entering that using a numeric keypad involves the same four >> keystrokes >> as entering 1830 mm. The use of meters is also consistent with the units >> used in the BMI calculation. >> >> How 1.83 m is stored in and retrieved from a database is not of course >> constrained by its written/printed representation. >> >> Bill >> ________________________________ >> Bill Potts, FBCS >> WFP Consulting >> 1848 Hidden Hills Drive >> Roseville, CA 95661-5804 >> Phone: 916 773-3865 (preferred) >> Cell: 916 302-7176 >> Excellence matters >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf >> Of STANLEY DOORE >> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 09:23 >> To: U.S. Metric Association >> Subject: [USMA:42394] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the >> US >> aimed at immigrants? >> >> >> 2 m = 200 cm = 2000 mm. So, measuring and recording in millimeters >> takes only one more digit and avoids a decimal point and provides more >> precision in whole numbers. >> In digital storage systems for people measurements, using mm is more >> efficient in practical applications since you are dealing only with one >> unit >> >> (mm) and not m and cm. This also avoids misunderstanding/confusion and >> simplifies operations. >> A similar argument applies in recording mass (kg and g) for people >> measurements. >> Stan Doore >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Paul Trusten" <[email protected]> >> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:58 PM >> Subject: [USMA:42381] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the >> US >> aimed at immigrants? >> >> >>> >>> Gene and Pat et al., >>> >>> The debate over grams and kilograms is evocative of the problem we have >>> with the poorly related units of ounces and pounds. Why disown the gram >>> from the kilogram? Aren't they "family"(grin)? >>> >>> I believe that all of us in a metric America---standards setters, >>> butchers, bakers, and healthcare professionals--should be able to deal >>> with grams OR kilograms, and be able to change between them by mere >>> inspection. As I mentioned, newborns' body masses are measured in >>> grams, >> >>> but thereafter, we tend to mentally move that decimal point so we can >>> calculate milligram-per-kilogram or milligram per square meter of body >>> surface area doses. For example, if I happen to have to calculate a >>> milligram-per-kilogram dose of the antibiotic gentamicin for a newborn >>> that weighs 2470 g, I would use the value 2.5 kg. The power and the >>> beauty of the decimal SI is that, with the correct symbols, and also >>> with >>> the knowledge of what (or who) is being measured (i.e., generally, no >>> newborn weighs 2.5 g; so the number must represent kilograms). Also, in >>> making these dose calculations, one place beyond the decimal marker is >>> usually sufficient. >>> >>> Concerning electronic data entry and storage, I can only use my >>> hospital's >> >>> system as an example. All body masses are stated in kilograms in the >>> heading of the medical record, and all heights are stated there in >>> centimeters (I think meters would be better, in order to facilitate body >>> mass index and body surface area calculation; better yet, the system >>> should calculate and post both values--BSA and BMI-- at the top of the >>> record). The notation in grams for neonates is usually found in the >>> supporting documents, i.e., nurses' and physicians' notes. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> >>> Sent: 20 January, 2009 14:21 >>> Subject: Re: [USMA:42373] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in >>> the US aimed at immigrants? >>> >>> >>>> Paul, >>>> >>>> Do you have contacts in the Joint Commission who might be persuaded to >>>> adopt "body mass in grams (up to 20 kg) and body mass in kilograms at >>>> 20 >>>> kg and more than 20 kilograms? >>>> >>>> Could there be an electronic data entry and storage problem for >>>> lifetime >>>> medical records containing both grams and kilograms? >>>> >>>> Gene. >>>> >>>> ---- Original message ---- >>>>>Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:46:40 -0600 >>>>>From: "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[email protected]> >>>>>Subject: [USMA:42373] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the >>>>>US aimed at immigrants? >>>>>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> >>>>>Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Gene et al, your answer. Yes, I think you're right, but they wrote: >>>>> >>>>>"Since patient weight is used to calculate most dosing (either as >>>>>weight-based >>>>>dosing, body surface area calculation, or other age-appropriate dose >>>>>determination), all pediatric patients should be weighed in kilograms >>>>>at >>>>>the >>>>>time of admission (including outpatient and ambulatory clinics) or >>>>>within >> >>>>>four >>>>>hours of admission in an emergency situation. Kilograms should be the >>>>>standard >>>>>nomenclature for weight on prescriptions, medical records and staff >>>>>communications." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Paul >>>>> >>>>>Quoting [email protected]: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Better: "body mass in kilograms" as in Body Mass Index (BMI). >>>>>> What is the precise quotation from the Joint Commission? >>>>>> ---- Original message ---- >>>>>> >Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:50:39 -0600 >>>>>> >From: "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[email protected]> >>>>>> >Subject: [USMA:42359] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in >>>>>> >the US >>>>>> aimed at immigrants? >>>>>> >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> >>>>>> >Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >... >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Yes--in the U.S., the Joint Commission (national healthcare >>>>>> >accrediting >>>>>> body) >>>>>> >has issued a guideline stating that all pediatric patients should be >>>>>> >weighed >>>>>> in >>>>>> >kilograms only and their weights stated in kilograms only. (I have >>>>>> >urged >>>>>> the JC >>>>>> >to suggest that ALL patient weights be measured and stated in >>>>>> >kilograms only >>>>>> and >>>>>> >their heights measured and stated in meters only.) >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Paul T. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Paul Trusten, R.Ph. >>>>>Public Relations Director >>>>>U.S. Metric Association (USMA), Inc. >>>>>www.metric.org <http://www.metric.org/> >>>>>3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apartment 122 >>>>>Midland TX 79707-2872 US >>>>>+1(432)528-7724 >>>>>mailto:[email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
