Paul,

Why does SI need to be "interpreted and modified"?  Isn't the rules 
self-explanatory and what possibly would need to be modified?  Doesn't that 
interfere with the universality of metrics?

Jerry




________________________________
From: Paul Trusten <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 11:03:05 AM
Subject: [USMA:42869] Boston Globe article on Sen. Judd Gregg


After fits and starts in the nomination/confirmation process, New Hampshire 
Senator Judd Gregg is poised to become the next U.S. Secretary of Commerce. The 
Commerce Department includes the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
(NIST).  Federal law gives the Secretary of Commerce the authority to 
"interpret or modify" the International System of Units for the United States.

See the Boston Globe at 
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/02/04/for_gregg_an_unlikely_new_assignment/


Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
www.metric.org    
3609 Caldera Blvd. Apt. 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 US
+1(432)528-7724
[email protected]



      

Reply via email to