Why not post something about what you have done to promote metrication and if it had a positive effect. I would be more then willing to hear it and discuss it.
Jerry ________________________________ From: Victor Jockin <[email protected]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 8:23:16 PM Subject: [USMA:43570] Re: A modest proposal I agree with Harry that this list has degraded significantly in recent weeks, and that the occasional useful post (related to practical issues surrounding US conversion to SI) is being buried by other noise. I've set message rules on my e-mail program to delete posts from certain individuals with a recent history of numerous low quality posts, but ideally the list itself would be cleaned of those people. Webmaster, why not limit this list to paying current members of USMA? I thought that was the point of this list. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Harry Wyeth" <[email protected]> Sent: 03/08/2009 5:10 PM To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> Subject: [USMA:43568] A modest proposal > > May I suggest that we do something to pigeonhole or earmark UK metric > discussion? Some of it is relevant to the US, of course, but 90% is not. > Much of it is discussions among three or four people. I want to read stuff > about US progress. The number of postings here is getting to the point where > I may unsubscribe for a few months to see if anything has changed. > Webmaster, any suggestions? > > HARRY WYETH > >
