The first thought that comes to mind is if this is so true then why have only a few companies converted to metric on their own? One would think that metrication should occur in a domino type of effect. That is one company does it, prospers and others follow. But this has not happened this way.
So who do we convince that not being metric is a drag on the economy and what facts do we use to prove this? We are in a depression and as millions are losing their jobs, how could we justify spending money on something that most have not been convinced would save our economy? America needs more then just an opinion to convince it to change, America needs proof. I asked a question a week or so ago about a national survey of every manufacturing company to ask a series of questions that would give all of some some insight in how each company deals with metric issues and if metric would be important to them for increasing their sales in the future. So in my opinion a survey would be needed to see where the issue stands and hopefully from the results (if they are positive enough) a workable plan can be worked out. Do you agree? Jerry ________________________________ From: Victor Jockin <[email protected]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 10:01:28 PM Subject: [USMA:43575] Re: Fw: A modest proposal Answer to Jerry's question below: because sticking with a measurement system that nobody else in the world uses is a drag on the US economy. From: Paul Trusten Sent: 03/08/2009 6:42 PM To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:43574] Re: Fw: A modest proposal I shall be delighted to join the consensus and concentrate on U.S. metrication. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeremiah MacGregor To: U.S. Metric Association Sent: 08 March, 2009 19:33 Subject: [USMA:43572] Fw: A modest proposal Well then why not start a thread on US progress? I'm sure you or someone has something to report. One thing I would like to question is: How do you justify metrication in the midst of the largest economic depression since the 1930s? Maybe this can start an interesting thread. Jerry ________________________________ From: Harry Wyeth <[email protected]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 8:10:39 PM Subject: [USMA:43568] A modest proposal May I suggest that we do something to pigeonhole or earmark UK metric discussion? Some of it is relevant to the US, of course, but 90% is not. Much of it is discussions among three or four people. I want to read stuff about US progress. The number of postings here is getting to the point where I may unsubscribe for a few months to see if anything has changed. Webmaster, any suggestions? HARRY WYETH
