Good letter.  Hopefully, it is the beginning of a continuing dialog.
 
I don't have my thoughts sufficiently organized to write to him yet.  However, 
I would like to introduce the idea that this is a domestic issue, not just an 
"international trade" issue.  We have a "measurement divide" in the U.S. much 
like the "digital divide" which gets more press.
 
We certainly have industries which remain staunchly Customary.  However, we 
also have industries and companies that have already converted to metric and 
need employees who can work in metric.  Those needs exist at all levels from 
the production floor to the engineering department.  Schools which fail to give 
students a grounding in metric measurement deny those students opportunities in 
these companies (or require the company to educate them).
 
Industries which are metric include the automotive industry (both domestic and 
transplant), electronics, pharmaceuticals, and many individual multinationals 
who are metric internally, whether or not their whole industry is.
 
I doubt the government even has good figures on what percentage of industry is 
metric or what percentage of students are poorly equipped to work there.
 


--- On Sat, 3/21/09, Paul Trusten <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Paul Trusten <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:44040] ATTN: Dr. Holdren -- the metric system of measurement for 
U.S. competitiveness
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 3:58 PM





2009-03-21
 
John P. Holdren, PhD, Director
Office of Science and Technology Policy
Executive Office of the President
725 17th Street Room 5228
Washington, DC 20502
 
Dear Dr. Holdren,
 
As you begin to lead President Obama's call to educate all Americans for the 
21st-century global economy,  I urge you to include, as a vital part of this 
challenge,  U.S. conversion to the metric system of measurement. 
 
Although Congress in 1988 declared the metric system to be the "preferred 
system of measurement" for U.S. trade and commerce, the Nation continues to be 
an island in a metric world. The U.S. is one of only three countries that 
has not yet written a plan to change over to the International System of Units 
(SI, or the modern metric system).  The other two countries are Liberia and 
Myanmar (Burma).  It would seem that any campaign to strengthen STEM (science, 
technology, engineering, and mathematics) training for all Americans would be 
to eliminate this old barrier to learning, commerce, and, as your office 
has said, to "participation in modern society." 
 
The U.S. Metric Association (USMA), Inc., is a non-profit, national 
organization, founded in 1916, and dedicated to U.S. changeover to SI as the 
Nation's sole, everyday, measurement standard. We believe that the time is now 
for our country to initiate a coordinated, national plan for the switch to 
metric.  A good starting point would be to teach only the metric system in our 
Nation's schools, and also work to educate Americans of all ages in the 
advantages of the decimal metric system.  If we fail to make this change soon, 
we may be overlooking a component of the reinvigorated economy you seek.
 
Sincerely,
 
 
Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
www.metric.org    
3609 Caldera Blvd. Apt. 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 US
+1(432)528-7724
[email protected]

Reply via email to