That could be a problem. NIST has their own version of an FPLA amendment, although so far, they have elected not to submit it to Congress. As a minimum, the effective differences between the two documents need to be understood and arguments for one over the other considered.
--- On Tue, 4/28/09, Jeremiah MacGregor <[email protected]> wrote: From: Jeremiah MacGregor <[email protected]> Subject: [USMA:44904] Re: FPLA 2010 To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 6:23 PM That is what you can expect if you just send it blindly to some stranger. Something of this importance needs to be hand delivered. Make an appointment to see someone from the NIST who would have the most influence and not only just hand it to him, but discuss it with him. Jerry From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 5:11:07 PM Subject: [USMA:44899] FPLA 2010 The first response from Washington D.C. to my latest draft, (FPLA-4-24.pdf), of FPLA 2010 is a text which appears to have been generated by computer from key words in my query.. The response does little more than rephrase my query.
