Although finally you admit to dual labelling in the UK ("coz Lee tells me so") 
the example you cite is almost as absurd as the 500 g "pound" and 500 L "pint" 
(and the metric record - lol).   What I mean is - in reality it does not 
happen.   454 g is essentially regarded as a pound.
 


Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:16:46 -0700
From: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:44939] Re: FPLA 2010
To: [email protected]





So technically a product marked as 450 g 1 lb would be tested to 450 g and the 
1 lb ignored.
 
Jerry





From: Ken Cooper <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:18:12 PM
Subject: [USMA:44924] Re: FPLA 2010






Gene
 
I think that you may have misinterpreted the directive and the national 
legislation of the EU members.
 
Metric is already the primary system used for trade measurement throughout the 
EU (apart from the pint for draught beer & doorstep milk in a few places)
 
In the EU, packages are required to comply with the requirements relating to 
their metric marking. A package marked "454 g 1 lb" would be tested to 454 g. A 
package marked "453 g 1 lb" would be tested to 453 g (ie the metric is always 
primary)
 
As far as I am aware, US packages marked with the same indications would be 
tested to 454 g & to 1 lb respectively (ie to the larger of the 2 contents 
declarations)

--- On Mon, 27/4/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:


From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:44885] FPLA 2010
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, 27 April, 2009, 5:06 PM



Mike,

The date the European Union *requires* metric units as primary indications of 
amount of contents in packages and on labels and in documentation of packages 
is 2010 January 1.

However, Member States of the EU are anticipated to *permit* but not require 
non-metric units as "supplementary indications" beyond January 1, as does the 
UK now.

Since "2010 January 1" is a "transition" date it seems appropriate as the 
target date for a new FPLA; "FPLA 2010" with time for new legislation in the 
United States.

The present FPLA *requires both* metric and inch-pound units.
This requirement for duality *does not* conform with the EU Metric Directive 
which requires metric units and merely permits non-metric units, even beyond 
January 1
---- Original message ----
>Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:18:24 +0000
>From: [email protected]  
>Subject: Re: [USMA:44855] FPLA 2010 as FPLA-4-24.pdf  
>To: [email protected], "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>Cc: <[email protected]>
>
>   Why 2010?  It should be 2009!
>    
>   Mike Holmes
>
>     -------------- Original message from
>     <[email protected]>: --------------
>
>     > Public Law 100-418 designates the metric system
>     of measurements as preferred for
>     > United States trade and commerce... It is not
>     481.
>     >
>     > Attached is Draft FPLA-4-24.pdf which makes that
>     correction.
>     >




_________________________________________________________________
Share your photos with Windows Live Photos – Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/

Reply via email to