Of course, that 112 EJ was used in a year, and is therefore really 112 EJ/year; 
that is a power.
 
The question is whether it is better expressed in the "convenient" units of 
exajoules per year, or the coherent units of 3.55 TW.  Arguments can be made on 
both sides, but once you measure energy over time, you have power.
 
In the same way, to use your other analogy, if you measure the distance you 
drive each year, you have, in fact, a speed. (not a very meaningful average 
speed as you don't drive continuously. A similar point can be made on average 
power use.)

--- On Fri, 5/8/09, Pat Naughtin <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:45039] Re: [SI] Letter to ed
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, May 8, 2009, 10:11 PM




On 2009/05/07, at 10:18 PM, Patrick Moore wrote:

The idea of selling an individual unit is brilliant. A campaign consists of 
many small objectives.






Dear Patrick and All,


What if we viewed the energy use of the USA like this:


In 2003, the USA used 112 exajoules of energy that was made up from:

*  42 exajoules from petroleum,
*  26 exajoules from natural gas,
*  26 exajoules from coal,
*  11 exajoules from nuclear energy, and
*   7 exajoules from renewable energy.


I chose 2003 because I had the figures readily available,


Cheers,


Pat Naughtin


PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008


Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. 
See http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact 
Pat at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication 
matters' newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to 
subscribe.

Reply via email to