Ezra et al.

Here is the latest communication I had with New York's W&M director. Alabama is 
an unknown quantity at this point.

Paul
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ross Andersen 
To: Paul Trusten 
Sent: 26 May, 2009 08:37
Subject: RE: UPLR and the metric option


Paul,



The project has been assigned to Counsel and we have been out in the 
marketplace surveying potential impact on packagers.



We are moving forward in drafting a proposal. However, because we are making 
drastic changes to both the labeling side and methods of sale, I do think it 
will be a little while before a proposal gets published. 



Ross J Andersen, Director
New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets
Bureau of Weights and Measures
10B Airline Drive
Albany, NY 12235
(518) 457-3146 or FAX (518) 457-5693



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Trusten [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 5:16 PM
To: Ross Andersen
Subject: UPLR and the metric option



Dear Mr. Andersen,



What progress, if any, has been made regarding New York State's consideration 
of the provisions of NIST Handbook 130, which contains the UPLR metric-only 
labeling option?



Sincerely,

Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
www.metric.org    
3609 Caldera Blvd. Apt. 122
Midland, Texas 79707-2872 US
+1(432)528-7724
[email protected]

Reply via email to