600 W, 24/7 is 14.4 kWh/day.  You guys get hosed on electricity.  I pay 
$0.12/kWh in the top tier, slightly less less for the first few kilowatt hours 
per day.

--- On Mon, 9/21/09, Harry Wyeth <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Harry Wyeth <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:45859] Solar panels (maybe off topic a tad....)
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, September 21, 2009, 5:05 AM


But 600 W (rounded off) of consumption, 24/7, is 8.64 kWh per day, or 259 
weekly.  At California rates of $0.24 per kWh (which many people pay at only 
the third of five tiers of rates) that is $62 per month.  Or $745 per year. 
With tax credits and rebates, it doesn't take that long to amortize one's net 
investment.  Also, 14933 kWh from two sets of panels over three years seems 
pretty puny.  With one set of 20 panels we generated 4400 kWh in one year--but 
I realize that this is not Connecticut either.

This won't change the world, but it saves money and if everyone did it, it 
would make a worthwhile change.

HARRY WYETH

Stan Jakuba wrote: 



Jim:
Interesting hobby you have, collecting all that weather info.Your conclusion 
of: 
average insolation        165.02 W/m2 (10 min average)
has not persuaded your relatives?
 
I suspect, they have relatives in this town then. The insolation here is 
160W/m². Some time ago I published this observation:
 
<West Hartford's solar panels installed on two highschool roofs produced 14,933 
kWh of electricity in about three years. This means that the panels generated 
average power of 570 W, enough to keep almost six 100 W lightbulbs lit.>
 
Amazingly, the flood of disapproving responses ignored, all of them, the basic 
fact that powering six lighbulbs for 3 yeas is not going to make any difference 
to anybody, not even the schools, nor the U.S., nor will it impoverish the 
sellers of "foreign oil." Impossible people to deal with. I guess it is a 
religion with them. Do not take our faith away with just plain facts. 
 
Well, not all of them are idealists. Many entrepreneurs I know are in it 
because "someone will spend the budget anyway" a budget approved by ignorant 
politicians. "So why not me."
Stan

Reply via email to