Karl, CC sirs:

 I assume, Karl is aware of my 'original contribution' and is possibly 'worried 
because of *1/j* factor i.e. the 2-year extra in 896-years 'not being divisible 
by six'. I have put up my views at:
http://www.brijvij.com/bb896-claim.pdf

which is only confirming that 10 KLWks could be inserted between 896-years. I 
agree that we need 29 Kepler LWks over (21*128)=2688-years cycle. But 
arithmatic 'confusion of '1/j factor as he points' is NOT applicable in case of 
896-years.

>The ten additional leap week years can be placed in nine intervals of 90 years 
>and one interval of 86 years.

This is the same: 'what I said in my previous note!'.  I now decrease this to 
84-years between colum 5 & column 6, and leaving rest of cycle with 90-years 
seperation, to place KLWks, i.e. Leap Weeks other than those divisible by six 
(6). My claim, to this thus is not for a cycle 'considered sham' - this may be 
dis-respect to my discovery of 1990's! The mixed cycle - (2*834)+1020 
=2688-years is another alternate.

My posting the original (distribution) published plan is in THIS context, sirs. 
The link provides sufficient to confirm this.

My regards,

Brij Bhushan Vij 

(MJD 55240)/1726+D-055W07-06 (G. Saturday, 2010 February 13H12:72(decimal) EST
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda 
Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30 
Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30 
(365th day of Year is World Day) 
My Profile:http://www.brijvij.com/bbv_2col-vipBrief.pdf
HOME PAGE: http://www.brijvij.com/ 
****
 

**As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendaar***** 
"Koi bhi cheshtha vayarth nahin hoti, purshaarth karne mein hai" 
Contact # 001 (201) 675-8548



 


Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:28:11 +0000
From: [email protected]
Subject: 986-year Cycle with interrupted 6-year cycle
To: [email protected]





Dear Brij and Calendar People
 
Here are my thoughts about how an 896-year cycle of 159 weeks can occur with 
regular leap week years that normally occur once every six years.
 
In an earlier note I referred to this idea as proposal B.
 
(1)    Every year whose number counted from the start of the current 896-year 
cycle is divisible by six has a leap week.
(2)    There are ten additional years that have a leap week every 896-year 
cycle referred to as Kepler years
 
This gives rise to an eight-year gap between the regular leap week years 
between the 894th year of one 896-year cycle and 6th year of the next 896-year 
cycle.
The ten additional leap week years can be placed in nine intervals of 90 years 
and one interval of 86 years.
 
I’ve realised that the 8-year gap adds about 1/3 week to the jitter. This can 
be reduced a little by putting the 86-year gap between the Kepler years over 
the end of the 896-year cycle. This has other advantages:
(a)    Every Kepler year can be placed half way between two consecutive leap 
week years.
(b)   Every Kepler year in the same 896-year cycle has its number ending with 
the same digit.
To do this, the first Kepler year must be earlier than the 87th year to fit the 
10th Kepler year in the 896-year cycle. I suggest making it the 45th year, 
because this makes the 896-year cycle completely symmetrical about its 2nd and 
450th years. Indeed year 900-Y is the same type as year Y counting Y from the 
start of any 896-year cycle.
 
This gives rise to the following leap week years:
 
0006   0012   0018   0024   0030   0036   0042   0045   0048   0054   0060   
0066   0072   0078   0084          0090   
0096   0102   0108   0114   0120   0126   0132   0135  0138   0144   0150   
0156   0162   0168   0174          0180   
0186   0192   0198   0204   0210   0216   0222   0225  0228   0234   0240   
0246    0252   0258   0264          0270   
0276   0282   0288   0294   0300   0306   0312   0315   0318   0324   0330   
0336   0342   0348   0354          0360   
0366   0372   0378   0384   0390   0396   0402   0405  0408   0414   0420   
0426   0432   0438   0444          0450   
0456   0462   0468   0474   0480   0486   0492   0495   0498   0504   0510   
0516   0522   0528   0534          0540   
0546   0552   0558   0564   0570   0576   0582   0585   0588   0594   0600   
0606   0612   0618   0624          0630   
0636   0642   0648  0654   0660   0666   0672   0675   0678   0684   0690   
0696   0702   0708   0714          0720   
0726   0732   0738   0744   0750   0756   0762   0765  0768   0774   0780   
0786   0792   0798   0804          0810   
0816   0822   0828   0834   0840   0846   0852   0855  0858   0864   0870   
0876   0882   0888   0894  
(next 896-year cycle… )  
0902   0908   0914   0920   0926   0932   0938   0941   0944  and so every 896 
years exactly.
 
Note that it is identical to a 90-year cycle with one Kepler year in the 
middle, but every 10th cycle has its last four years cut off.
 
The shortened 86-year gap between the Kepler Years(855 – 941)  only partially 
compensates for 1/3 week jitter caused by the 8-year gap between the regular 
leap week years (894 – 902). To fully compensate, the interval must be cut by 
1/3 rather than just 4 years. It can be cut to 62 years. This results in Kepler 
years thus: 
 
Keplers Leap weeks (10 in each set of 896-years)
  1          2         3         4         5         6         7         8      
   9       10
0033   0123   0219   0309   0405   0495  0591   0681   0777   0867
0929   1019   1115   1205   1301   1391  1487   1577   1673   1763
and so every 896 years.
 
This brings back the alternating 90 to 96 year intervals between the Kepler 
years, while the regular leap weeks years occur once every six years. Indeed 
the nine such intervals make up an 834-year cycle identical to one I have 
suggested a long time ago. To this is added a 62 year period of 10 regular leap 
week years and one Kepler year.
 
I realise the regular leap week years occurring once every six year call for 
additional leap week years occurring in intervals of 90 and 96 years normally 
alternating. Give them anything else and you’ll be penalised.
 
Karl
 
10(17(29

-- 
Scanned by iCritical. 

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/

Reply via email to