With the further irony that warning road signs are required to be placed at 
various prescribed distances from the posted hazard (such as 400 meters ahead, 
200 meters ahead, etc.) while those very same signs are required to state that 
metric distance in yards (e.g. 400 yards, 200 yards, etc.) 

-- Ezra 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Davis" <[email protected]> 
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 12:42:06 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [USMA:46644] And, by the way...... 


.....although, again, admittedly rare, newspapers and books in the UK have been 
known to use kilometres as well as miles. 

Yes, all signposts on UK public roads are legally required to read in miles and 
feet (although this is not always the case) but some publcations, particularly 
newspapers, will happily mix kilometres with miles 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Stephen Davis 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 8:32 PM 
Subject: [USMA:46643] Re: Burma 


"I can assure you that almost all publications, and other media outlets, would 
use miles over here. Based on the non-metrication of our roads I'd guess." 

Except for private roads of course, which can use metric signs if they wish. 
And though it is admittedly pretty rare, you can find mixtures of metric and 
imperial on British road signs....bridge heights, for example, can often be in 
metres other than, or as well as, feet. 

A statement on the sorry mess that measurement is in this country, 
unfortunately. 





----- Original Message ----- 
From: Stephen Humphreys 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 7:10 PM 
Subject: [USMA:46629] Re: Burma 

Not sure. Some publishers use kiolmetres for international books. Perhaps it's 
something like that. Like the way 'BBC World' would say 'The accident happened 
3 kilometres from the junction' with the exact same feature being broadcast as 
'The accident happened 2 miles from the junction' in domestic BBC stations. You 
mention it as a excerpt - was the spelling 'metER' as you mention or 'metRE'? 


I can assure you that almost all publications, and other media outlets, would 
use miles over here. Based on the non-metrication of our roads I'd guess. 


Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:34:26 +0000 
From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [USMA:46627] Re: Burma 


But then how does that explain why they gave the distance only in kilometers 
and not both kilometers and miles? 

-- Ezra 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Humphreys" <[email protected]> 
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 5:40:34 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [USMA:46622] Re: Burma 





Ezra:"I noted in one of their (free) excerpts from another part of the book 
that they referred to the length of a particular railway journey in kilometres, 
which I presume was done for the benefit of their (UK) readers." 







Surely you mean 'miles' (UK tracks being in miles and UK citizens usage). km 
would be there for Australia for example. 

Not got a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - Free 

We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now 

Reply via email to