Well found Ezra - photographic evidence of at least one aspect of measurement 
usage in Burma. And a glimpse into the country of that awful regime.

Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:28:04 +0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:46642] Re: Burma




I did get pointed to the attached photo from a stock photo website in the UK. I 
cannot say how recent or how widespread this kind of distance signage is in 
Burma.

-- Ezra



Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:34:14 +0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:46631] Re: Burma




Yes, Stephen, I thought about it some more and came to the same conclusion you 
have.

What threw me off, I think, is that I saw some indications somewhere in the 
Lonely Planet publications that they originate in the UK. But your analogy with 
the BBC World Service sounds right to me. They likely made an editorial 
decision to have just one unit of measure in their publications and that would 
naturally be metric to be (in theory at least) understood world-wide.

Ezra


And they used the UK spelling of "kilometre". 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Humphreys" <[email protected]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 11:10:19 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [USMA:46629] Re: Burma



Not sure.  Some publishers use kiolmetres for international books.  Perhaps 
it's something like that.  Like the way 'BBC World' would say 'The accident 
happened 3 kilometres from the junction' with the exact same feature being 
broadcast as 'The accident happened 2 miles from the junction' in domestic BBC 
stations.  You mention it as a excerpt - was the spelling 'metER' as you 
mention or 'metRE'? 


I can assure you that almost all publications, and other media outlets, would 
use miles over here.  Based on the non-metrication of our roads I'd guess.



Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:34:26 +0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:46627] Re: Burma




But then how does that explain why they gave the distance only in kilometers 
and not both kilometers and miles?

-- Ezra

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Humphreys" <[email protected]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 5:40:34 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [USMA:46622] Re: Burma







Ezra:"I noted in one of their (free) excerpts from another part of the book 
that they referred to the length of a particular railway journey in kilometres, 
which I presume was done for the benefit of their (UK) readers."






Surely you mean 'miles' (UK tracks being in miles and UK citizens usage).  km 
would be there for Australia for example.


Not got a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - Free


We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now


Do you want a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - Free                               
          
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/

Reply via email to