Carleton makes a good point about grocery stores. My UKMA contacts tell me that 
Imperial has disappeared from chain stores. Only local traders and shops might 
sometimes post Imperial signs depending on their clientele and their own 
political views. :-) 

Ezra 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: [email protected] 
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 12:11:35 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [USMA:46683] RE: And, by the way...... 




I'm not sure Stephen (Humphreys) is wrong. He seems to be just describing how 
the average person sees these signs: My car has broken down; if I give the 
numbers on this sign, someone will be able to find me. Since the distance 
figure does not say what units are used, the driver may not know what they are 
- in his mind they may just be a location number, with no understanding of how 
that number was derived. So he seems to be simply describing an observed fact, 
that the average driver is not seeing km on the road, marked as such. 



As long as the regulatory (speed limit) or informational (how far it is to ---) 
signs are in imperial, the driver is going to think he is in a mile world. 
Interesting how little remains to be done - the road information, beer, milk, 
and how people measure their bodies colloquially. When I was over there in May 
of 2009 I could see that pretty much everything else was metric, but the road 
sign stuff is so overwhelming that people don't think so. 



In Kenilworth since the last time I was there in 2005 a new, very nice, upscale 
grocery store, Waitrows, had been built. Other than the pints of milk, 
everything was purely metric, including how much meat and produce cost. (Not 
even any small signs like 50p/lb next to the 1.20 kg.) However, that didn't 
stop my American-born friend Barbara from asking for a "quarter" of salami from 
the deli counter. I had no idea what she was talking about; she said she wanted 
a quarter-pound. I noted that the price sign was only in grams, but apparently 
asking for a "quarter" is a colloquialism that goes way back. The sales clerk 
dutifully measured out 125 g of salami. I pointed out to Barbara that she got 
slightly over a "quarter" of a pound but she didn't mind. (Barbara is about my 
age.) 



Carleton 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Davis" <[email protected]> 
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 2:29:06 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [USMA:46681] RE: And, by the way...... 


" 
"It's neither pro- or anti- either 'side' to realise that people will quite 
obviously see many instances of yards and miles on even the shortest of 
journeys. It's also correct to argue that many of the road plans would be in 
metric and as we've seen here the emergency markers on the side of motorways 
(and, by the way, on some dual carriageways) are metrically distanced." 

So we ARE in agreement that signs in kilometres exist on UK public roads? 
Strange...you appeared to be arguing the opposite earlier on. 

"Perhaps we could steer this more towards the use of imperial or metric on 
roads in the USA which - after all - is what this listserver is meant to be 
representing (even if the occasional glimpse of 'how others do it' adds some 
interest to the debate)." 

Yes lets change the subject, Rught on cue!! Boy, you;re not one to admit you're 
wrong, Steve, are you? How sad! 




----- Original Message ----- 
From: Stephen Humphreys 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:55 PM 
Subject: [USMA:46679] RE: And, by the way...... 

You hit the nail on the head, Ezra. Although you tend to be refreshingly 
consistent with regards to speaking common sense. 


It's neither pro- or anti- either 'side' to realise that people will quite 
obviously see many instances of yards and miles on even the shortest of 
journeys. It's also correct to argue that many of the road plans would be in 
metric and as we've seen here the emergency markers on the side of motorways 
(and, by the way, on some dual carriageways) are metrically distanced. It's one 
of those occasions that we know about regarding 'public consumption' versus the 
technical aspect. You could even probably say there is some 'hidden metric' to 
some degree. 


When driving down the motorway, though, in an average British car (and I mean 
'British' for the British market and sadly not 'mad in Britain') the driver 
will see many measures. This will be mph and - on some cars - a smaller ring of 
km/h. They will also see miles covered, down to tenths in some cases. A 
temperature gauge may well quote Celsius temperatures. Outside the window the 
driver will note distances and speed limits in the main. These will be miles 
(and fractions) , yds, and mph. On motorway driving you won't see width and 
height signs unless the road is being dug up when you might see imperial only 
or imperial with metric. 


If you crash your car badly - or your car stops working on the motorway - you 
might (but not definitely) get to use the markers at the side of the road. 
Chances are you might be asked to read off what is written on them. To most 
people they will be quite unaware of the fact that these figures mean something 
metrically. Even less people will know that there is an argument going on 
regarding whether these signs are metric or - strangely on this listserver - 
whether these signs are metric (yes, that's not a mistake!) 


Ezra - your point summarises the experience of an ordinary Brit - and - infact 
- anyone from abroad visiting the UK who might be more sensitive to the use of 
imperial, ie more than indigenous Brits who take them completely for granted. 


Perhaps we could steer this more towards the use of imperial or metric on roads 
in the USA which - after all - is what this listserver is meant to be 
representing (even if the occasional glimpse of 'how others do it' adds some 
interest to the debate). 


Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:26:45 +0000 
From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [USMA:46677] RE: And, by the way...... 


The core issue as I interpret it is what is the daily perception for the 
typical British driver as they drive up and down the roads in the UK, i.e., 
what impression "stays" with them and affects their usage of units in daily 
speech. 

In this regard I'd wager that the overwhelming presence of Imperial signage 
clearly marked as such is what influences those drivers the most, which I am 
convinced is the main reason why "miles" is still used as much as it is over 
there. 

-- Ezra 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Davis" <[email protected]> 
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:22:15 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [USMA:46675] RE: And, by the way...... 


"Thank you Stephen - your post with pictures confirms what I said. 
No 'm' (for miles OR metres), no km no yds. They're unitless. Just the number 
(refer to you own 'copy and paste' for how they relate to 500 metre markers)" 

Oh, Steve....I'll give you 10 out of 10 for trying at least. Just because they 
don't have km written on the signs, they're not km, when HM Government points 
out that they clearly are? Measurements are clearly in km, 20,000 of 'em up and 
down the country on slip roads. That would appear to strongly suggest they do 
exist. 


"They are for emergency crews - and they give a quick way of pinpointing a 
broken down car or an accident." 

Not altogether sure what your point is here. This negates the existence of of 
these signs how exactly? 


"In the past we have had the discussion on this very listserver on the use of 
'm' for miles - eg 'Services 23m'. In the USA they make extensive use of 'mi' 
for miles to differentiate from 'm' for metres/meters. I don't know why we in 
the UK decided to use 'm' for miles rather than 'mi' or 'Mi'." 

Erm....not with me, you haven't!! I'm not sure what the issue you describe 
above has got to do with the fact there is 20,000 signs on UK public roads with 
kilometre measurements on them.Yes...there are signs on Motorways with the 
letter "m" that signifies miles........your point is.....? 

"Stephen - we appear to be in agreement." 

Well the clear existence of 20,000 signs with kilometre measurements on them on 
public roads up and down the country would suggest that one of us has great 
difficulty in admitting we've been caught out being disingenous about this 
issue. 

I think that's probably you, Steve! 

. 







----- Original Message ----- 
From: Stephen Humphreys 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:39 PM 
Subject: [USMA:46672] RE: And, by the way...... 

Thank you Stephen - your post with pictures confirms what I said. 
No 'm' (for miles OR metres), no km no yds. They're unitless. Just the number 
(refer to you own 'copy and paste' for how they relate to 500 metre markers) 


They are for emergency crews - and they give a quick way of pinpointing a 
broken down car or an accident. 


For "quoted imperial", as it were, you need to look at the huge signs showing 
directions to towns, cities, services, motorway work etc. 


In the past we have had the discussion on this very listserver on the use of 
'm' for miles - eg 'Services 23m'. In the USA they make extensive use of 'mi' 
for miles to differentiate from 'm' for metres/meters. I don't know why we in 
the UK decided to use 'm' for miles rather than 'mi' or 'Mi'. 


Stephen - we appear to be in agreement. 


From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [USMA:46670] RE: And, by the way...... 
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:51:44 +0000 


" Martin, 


They don't have 'm', 'km', mile ('m' again), or yds on them. 
They're not for public consumption. 
Although I'm not going to stop you 'using' them ;-)" 

Well...Martin has included a web address that seems to show their existence. 

Over to you, Steve, old bean! 

Incidentally, a quick google search found this article: 

http://www.libdemvoice.org/20000-road-signs-in-kilometers-an-evil-eu-plot-17417.html
 

This is the article: 

20,000 road signs in kilometers – an evil EU plot? 

By Iain Roberts | Published 3rd January 2010 - 4:31 pm 
This is the first Christmas that anyone travelling on our motorways really 
couldn’t avoid signs measuring distance in – whisper it – kilometers . 
trunk road marker
Every 500 meters or so along just about every motorway – and some trunk roads – 
in Britain, one of these blue signs helpfully tells the the stranded, 
mobile-phone wielding, motorist not only which road and carriageway she’s on 
but how many kilometers she is along it. Not miles. Not even good old British 
furlongs or barleycorns (which is a shame). But evil revolutionary French 
kilometers. 
Some EU plot force us to go metric? 
No. We might have our litres, kilos and decimal currency. We even have 
generations growing up knowing how many miles to the gallon their car does 
without having the faintest idea how much a gallon of petrol actually is, but 
we’re not being forced to start measuring distance on our roads in kilometers 
(though I guess we might choose to one day, and I can’t say it would bother me 
personally too much if we did). 
These signs result in help getting to stranded motorists ten percent faster in 
an age when most calls for assistance are made on mobile phones and, when asked 
where you are the answer “ on a motorway somewhere. Near Nottingham, I think. ” 
isn’t actually massively helpful. 
For the last thirty years, our motorways have had posts placed every hundred 
metres, mainly for maintenance crews. Now the blue signs are helping motorists 
too. 
So as you drive around Britain’s motorway network, keep an eye out for the blue 
signs (especially on the M26 in Kent, which the Government appears to think is 
a slip road), ponder the creeping metrication of Britain and perhaps enjoy 
knowing just how many kilometers you are from the start of the road. 





----- Original Message ----- 
From: Martin Vlietstra 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 9:27 PM 
Subject: [USMA:46654] RE: And, by the way...... 




Steve has obviously not traveled on any motorways for some years, otherwise he 
would have noticed the driver location signs (which are in kilometres). 
Wikipedia has a description – please visit 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_location_signs . 






From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Stephen Humphreys 
Sent: 14 February 2010 22:33 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Subject: [USMA:46649] RE: And, by the way...... 



It's miles and yards, not miles and feet. 





(apart from - as you said - feet for width and height). 





I've yet to see my first sighting of a 'km' sign in my travels up and down the 
UK (and we've travelled extensively). Apart from anything UK cars use what's 
called a 'milometer' - a British morphing of the term odometer and miles. I 
don't see how UK cars could make use of distances in a system drivers cannot 
use on their instrumentation (unless they import a car from abroad - 'grey 
imports' - although I have seen many subarus bought this way which have had 
their instruments changed to 'mph only' presumably for the more stricter MoT 
stations). I've also not seen the use of km in newspapers - except for one 
paper called 'Metro' which actually has a policy of using metric(!) but even 
with that they'll bracket imperial (apart from, bizarrely, snow depth which 
they quote in inches but then bracket 'cm' - maybe they think inches are 
metric!). In practice the normal daily's will even 'translate' a distance which 
would ordinarily definitely be in km to miles (eg a report from France). Like 
domestic BBC new items. 



From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [USMA:46644] And, by the way...... 
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:42:06 +0000 


.....although, again, admittedly rare, newspapers and books in the UK have been 
known to use kilometres as well as miles. 





Yes, all signposts on UK public roads are legally required to read in miles and 
feet (although this is not always the case) but some publcations, particularly 
newspapers, will happily mix kilometres with miles 




----- Original Message ----- 


From: Stephen Davis 


To: U.S. Metric Association 


Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 8:32 PM 


Subject: [USMA:46643] Re: Burma 





"I can assure you that almost all publications, and other media outlets, would 
use miles over here. Based on the non-metrication of our roads I'd guess." 





Except for private roads of course, which can use metric signs if they wish. 
And though it is admittedly pretty rare, you can find mixtures of metric and 
imperial on British road signs....bridge heights, for example, can often be in 
metres other than, or as well as, feet. 





A statement on the sorry mess that measurement is in this country, 
unfortunately. 







----- Original Message ----- 


From: Stephen Humphreys 


To: U.S. Metric Association 


Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 7:10 PM 


Subject: [USMA:46629] Re: Burma 




Not sure. Some publishers use kiolmetres for international books. Perhaps it's 
something like that. Like the way 'BBC World' would say 'The accident happened 
3 kilometres from the junction' with the exact same feature being broadcast as 
'The accident happened 2 miles from the junction' in domestic BBC stations. You 
mention it as a excerpt - was the spelling 'metER' as you mention or 'metRE'? 





I can assure you that almost all publications, and other media outlets, would 
use miles over here. Based on the non-metrication of our roads I'd guess. 



Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:34:26 +0000 
From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [USMA:46627] Re: Burma 


But then how does that explain why they gave the distance only in kilometers 
and not both kilometers and miles? 

-- Ezra 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Humphreys" <[email protected]> 
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 5:40:34 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [USMA:46622] Re: Burma 






Ezra:"I noted in one of their (free) excerpts from another part of the book 
that they referred to the length of a particular railway journey in kilometres, 
which I presume was done for the benefit of their (UK) readers." 











Surely you mean 'miles' (UK tracks being in miles and UK citizens usage). km 
would be there for Australia for example. 





Not got a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - Free 





We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now 





Not got a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - Free 

Do you want a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - Free 

Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now

Reply via email to