You might well run into problems if you tried to export that food to the
United Kingdom - I don’t think that the argument that it says “Calories”
rather than “calories”  would convince many people here.

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: 24 February 2010 15:20
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:46751] Re: NY Times and kilojoules

 


Actually...the law says kilocalorie shall be used and it shall be called
Calorie.   Big C.   Silly I think, but technically accurate.   Canada uses
kcal.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [USMA:46749] Re: NY Times and kilojoules
From: "John M. Steele" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, February 24, 2010 3:17 am
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>

It seems to me that what she really had to explain was "calorie" whereas
kilojoule was almost an aside for international readers.  Our food labeling
laws require that the kilocalorie shall be used and it shall be called
calorie.  That is confusing.  If you don't understand the unit you are
starting with, it is harder than normal to convert to kilojoules (which may
NOT be legally used here on nutrition labels).  (It may be allowed as
supplemental, but not to replace mislabelled kilocalories.)

 


  _____  


From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, February 24, 2010 3:00:24 AM
Subject: [USMA:46748] NY Times and kilojoules

Dear All, 

 

It is only a small mention in the first paragraph of the Notes but the
editor at the NY Times actually felt that they had to explain the meaning
when they used kilojoules. Here is the paragraph:

 

The term “calorie” sometimes causes confusion. Most people, when referring
to the energy content of food, use “calorie” instead of “kilocalorie” —
which is the actual unit that food energy is measured in. When I refer to 30
calories, I am following this convention and therefore technically mean 30
kilocalories. For metric system users, that’s about 125 kilojoules.

To see this in context go to
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/stand-up-while-you-read-this
where you might be concerned about the ideas in the article.

 

Cheers,




 

Pat Naughtin

Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, that you can obtain from
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
<http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html >  

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,

Geelong, Australia

Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

 

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands
each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat
provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and
professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in
Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian
Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the
UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com/
<http://www.metricationmatters.com/ to>  to subscribe.

 

Reply via email to