I understand your point but with respect an aeroplane is not a baby and I was 
talking about figures for human weight.  A professional that can 'scale' 
someone by using imperial or metric will clearly see exaggerative mistakes.  
I'm 12st 6lb.  If a professional looked at me with 126kg in his head I would 
query his training! 

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [USMA:46775] Re: babies produced, UK
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:07:13 +0000










Stephen said:
"With an immersion into body weights as 
professionals have in this field I'd find it hard to believe that those same 
professionals would make such huge errors. "
 
Many years ago, an Air Canada Boeing 767 was refueled in 
kg on a flight from Vancouver to Toronto (AC had converted to metric).  The 
refueling system was still calculated in lbs.  The operator made a wrong 
conversion - dividing the required kg by 2.2 instead of multiplying to 
calculate 
the lbs.  The plane's fuel gauges weren't working, so the flight deck 
didn't actually know how much fuel the plane had on board.
 
The aircraft ran out of fuel over the Canadian 
prairies.  Fortunately the first officer knew of a disused military 
airfield in Manitoba, and the aircraft made a spectacular dead stick landing 
(quite a few tires got burst!).
 
In spite of the fact that the feul system operator should 
have realised that the time taken to refuel was only one fifth of what it 
should 
have been; in spite of the fact that the plane was much lighter than it should 
have been (and therefore reached take-off speed much sooner than it should 
have), not one of these professionals - fuel system operator, captain or first 
officer - realised this at the time.
 
Professionals DO make those kinds of measurement 
errors Stephen.  All the more reason to have ONE measurement system, and 
that it must be metric.
 
John F-L

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: 
  Stephen 
  Humphreys 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 10:25 
  PM
  Subject: [USMA:46775] Re: babies 
  produced, UK
  
"Steve, since the surgeon and midwife who delivered 
  your son discussed his weight in imperial units, would this place the 
hospital 
  in the 10% who keep their scales permanently switched to imperial units?  
  For the sake of your family’s health I trust not – such action are indicative 
  of poor management."
  

  - No I'm almost 
  positive it was in metric - the nurse did something to convert it to 
imperial. 
   I can't remember in detail if this was via a switch or conversion chart 
  - try to remember what I was observing ;-)
  And I really don't 
  think imperial will damage the health of my baby - but thanks for the 
  concern.
  

  "The Government 
  will be issuing a statement shortly on the matter – I only trust that 
  hospitals will take heed of the advise and not wait to be rapped over the 
  knuckles by a coroner following in incorrect dosage caused for instance by a 
  the scales reading 11 stone 4 lbs and somebody recording that as 114 kg.  
  (For the record 11 st 4 lbs is 71 kg)."
  

  With an immersion 
  into body weights as professionals have in this field I'd find it hard to 
  believe that those same professionals would make such huge errors.  I've 
  heard of the 'decimal point error' though - although I won't blame metric for 
  that.   
  

  Martin - please 
  take what I say with some thought - you have been brought up in places like 
  S.Africa with hard laws forcing metric usage regarding things like this. 
   Stones & pounds are really deeply entrenched in the psyche of most 
  Brits.  It is an example of why the UK *WOULD NOT* quickly go metric if 
  the USA goes metric - they have never(?) had the stone.   I really think 
  that forcing people not to use stones will backfire on pushing metric as a 
  preferred system.  You don't have to believe me but it's my honestly held 
  opinion.


  
  From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; 
  [email protected]
Subject: RE: [USMA:46745] Re: babies produced, 
  UK
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:10:59 +0000


  

  

  

  
  It might interest 
  readers to know that the matter of hospital scales was debated in the British 
  House of Lords this week.  A full transcript of the debate can be found 
  at 
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldhansrd/text/100225-0001.htm#10022584000562.
 
   One of the important comments was “Does she [the minister] further 
  understand that last year, LACORS, the Local Authorities Co-ordinators of 
  Regulatory Services, carried out a major survey that found that 30 per cent 
of 
  weighing machines in hospitals were switchable between metric and imperial 
  units and that a staggering 10 per cent were permanently switched to imperial 
  units only?”  Steve, since the surgeon and midwife who delivered your 
  son discussed his weight in imperial units, would this place the hospital in 
  the 10% who keep their scales permanently switched to imperial units?  
  For the sake of your family’s health I trust not – such action are indicative 
  of poor management.  
   
  The following comment 
  was also made: “Is she aware that the importance of this topic 
  relates to the fact that the dosage of many powerful drugs is now calculated 
  according to the weight in kilograms of the recipient? If, in error, such a 
  calculation used imperial units, there would be a serious risk of 
under-dosage 
  or, more importantly, major over-dosage”. 
  The Government will be issuing a statement shortly on the matter – I only 
  trust that hospitals will take heed of the advise and not wait to be rapped 
  over the knuckles by a coroner following in incorrect dosage caused for 
  instance by a the scales reading 11 stone 4 lbs and somebody recording that 
as 
  114 kg.  (For the record 11 st 4 lbs is 71 kg).
   
  Comment sponsored by 
  the UKMA can be found at http://www.metricviews.org.uk.
   
   
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Stephen 
  Humphreys
Sent: 23 February 
  2010 22:04
To: U.S. Metric 
  Association
Subject: 
  [USMA:46745] Re: babies produced, UK
   
  I'm watching Derren Brown on TV, 
  Martin - are you following his footsteps in the psychic department? 
   ;-)
  
   
  
  Yes - we had a boy by C-section 
  9 months ago!  Ta-da!!!!
  
   
  
  Some points to keep on topic 
  (and you only have my word on this but I hope you take into consideration 
  other points I've made in the past!)
  
   
  
  This in on reflection - I was 
  otherwise pre-occupied at the time!  And speechless! (40 mins earlier I 
  was 'safely' at work none the wiser).
  
   
  
  When he was born he was put on 
  some scales which were metric - the nurse said "he's a good weight for 1 
month 
  early"
  
  The C-section surgeon (and this 
  is important) who was *not British* asked how much he weighed.  The nurse 
  responded "6lb 3" to which the surgeon said - "that's 
  good".
  
   
  
  His (the baby's) records have an 
  entry for both metric and imperial throughout.  I have no doubt that the 
  'official' figures are metric but the records show 
  both.
  
   
  
  Before he was born my wife went 
  for a blood test at the hospital.  I saw the needle.  Let me explain 
  - I have a needle phobia.  Immediately I had to leave the room.  I 
  wandered about but started feeling faint (I've never fainted but I felt very 
  heavy and not at all well but at least I was in the right place).  To get 
  my mind off the needle I looked at an adult weighing machine.  The units 
  ON the machine were metric.  There was a plastic coated sign on the wall 
  immediately behind the scales which translated it to 
  st/lb.
  
   
  
  Finally - we are members of an 
  NCT group.  Without fail the mothers all used floz when making up mixes 
  or expressing.  With the milk formula that's not surprising as the 
  instructions on the side read downwards under the floz column as 
1,2,3,4,5,6,7 
  with the millilitre figures next to it in hundreds.
  
   
  
  I have no doubt that official 
  records record the metric weight however without fail all the people involved 
  "spoke" imperial.
  
   
  
  Dilation would have been in 'cm' 
  though - if it were not an emergency!!
  
   
  
  P.S.  One for the books - 
  the missus WHILST IN LABOUR AND HAVING CONTRACTIONS drove to the hospital 
  filling up with fuel on the way.
  
  When I called her back at home 
  from work surprised to find her still at home (considering she had called me 
  saying she did not feel 'right') she said that she hadn't put make up on 
  yet!!
  
   
  
  "Women" 
  !!!
  
  
  
  From: 
  [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:46741] 
  Re: metric products UK
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:40:14 
  +0000
  
  A small note about 
  scales used for measuring people in the UK.  
   
  Scales that are 
  destined for domestic use have invariably been dual-unit since the 1970’s. 
   However since a report last year that criticized certain hospitals for 
  using domestic quality scales that had not been properly maintained was 
  published, it has become mandatory for the medical profession to use 
  professional-quality scales (which are regularly recalibrated) and which show 
  kilograms only.  Official medical records are kept in metric units, 
  though a baby’s birth-weight might be communicated to the parents in either 
  units.  Steve Humphries is more up-to-date than me on that – he became a 
  father in the last year or two.  The weights of my children (born 1980’s) 
  was certainly communicated to me in metric units – 3.50 kg and 
  4.05 kg.  I do not recall the imperial equivalents nor do I recall 
  having been given them.
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Stephen Davis
Sent: 23 February 2010 20:25
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:46739] Re: metric products 
  UK
   
  
  The vast majority of things in the 
  UK are fully metric, John.
  
   
  
  The only time you will really see 
  mixed units is with loose goods like fruit and veg on market stalls.  The 
  metric measurement must be more pronounced than the imperial 
  measurement.  This is largely academic since these items must be weighed 
  on fully metric scales anyway.  Pints of beer, of course, are the only 
  real fully imperial item in the UK.
  
   
  
  Scales that measure people (in 
  stones: 14 pounds) will probably mentioned by some, but the majority of 
recent 
  ones also weigh in kilograms as well.
  
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    
    
    From: John 
    Frewen-Lord 
    
    To: U.S. Metric 
    Association 
    
    Sent: 
    Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:47 PM
    
    Subject: 
    [USMA:46734] metric products UK
    
     
    
    To all those who say that the UK 
    is not really metric:
    
     
    
    I was researching the town of 
    Axminster on Google, and came across this website regarding hydraulic 
    bricquette presses.  All specs as far as I can see are in metric 
    units.
    
     
    
    
http://www.axminster.co.uk/product-Rojek-BrikStar-50-Hydraulic-Briquette-Press-582182.htm
    
     
    
    John F-L
   
  
  
  
  Do you want a Hotmail account? 
  Sign-up now - 
  Free

  
  Do you want a Hotmail account? Sign-up 
  now - Free                                      
_________________________________________________________________
Tell us your greatest, weirdest and funniest Hotmail stories
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/

Reply via email to