Dear All,

Here is another example where Derek Pollard talks about simple, honest, open, and worldwide metric units while the anti-metric interviewee and the interviewer discuss the quality of the world and how boring it would be if our measurements were honest. They also argue for all kinds of traditional units such as floor measurements in Japan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9WLD2AVdhk&feature=digest

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, that you can obtain from http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication matters' newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.

On 2010/04/05, at 16:44 , Pat Naughtin wrote:

Dear All,

As you know conversations about the metric system often degrade into a discussion where:

* the proponents of the metric system are trying to promote simple, honest, open, and worldwide standards for measuring of all things in the Universe, and

* the proponents of all of the old measuring methods that have ever existed anywhere, and at any time, are arguing for the continued preservation of all of the old words used for all of the old measuring words. These folk often promote words with multiple values – international and statute feet come to mind.

As an example from the 1970s, pro-metric builders in Australia were successful in reducing almost all lengths on a building site to millimetres only while anti-metric people were insisting that keeping chains, rods, poles, perches, yards, feet, inches, and all of the possibilities of applying fractions (common, vulgar, binary, decimal, etc. to each of these) were more in keeping with traditional values.

In the radio interview at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxirJUVAEfg&feature=digest Robin Paice, Chair of the UK Metric Association argues for accurate measurements while the interviewer keeps move the discussion on to the politics of the 40 year old metric transition in the UK or onto the meaning of the basic words involved; when he asks questions such as, 'What is metric?'

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, that you can obtain from http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication matters' newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.


Reply via email to