I think properly the blame in both cases should be assigned to Congress (I'm 
not sure which party, primarily).  Both Presidents were dealt a bad hand by 
Congress relative to metrication, and the President and Federal agencies can't 
go outside the bounds set by Congress.
 
Congress established the bounds for the metrication board and ensured it was 
weak, powerless, ineffectual, and represented both pro/con to assure it 
couldn't agree on anything.  Since it was useless, it was only a waste of 
money.  Perhaps Reagan could have tried harder with Congress to get them to set 
new bounds, but within the existing bounds, mercy killing was the best action.
 
Clinton signed the bills into law, but Congress passed the laws that gutted 
some metrication plans under EO12770.
The law requiring consideration of Customary bricks and lighting fixtures 
gutted modularity in Federal metric construction and made it a 
conversion-fest.  Eliminating the deadline for highway metrication enabled the 
States (and all 50 used it) to tell FHWA to stuff their metrication plans, also 
the law preventing Federal funding of metric highway signs eventually led to 
the MUTCD dropping metrication of highway signage effective the 2009 edition.  
I would say those agencies made a valiant effort to continue their metrication 
programs, but were ultimately defeated by Congress, not their administrations.
 
Congress, not Presidents, is the principal obstacle to metrication in the 
United States, despite "grandstanding" metric as the preferred system of 
measure in 1988.  More than anyone, Congress speaks with forked tongue on the 
issue.
--- On Tue, 2/8/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:


From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:49803] Re: Ronald Reagan--NOT an enemy of U.S. metrication
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 9:09 AM



Interestingly enough, I blame the Clinton administration for backing down off 
various pro-metric measures.  Especially the DOT stuff with the states.  Utter 
foolishness.



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [USMA:49801] Re: Ronald Reagan--NOT an enemy of U.S.
metrication
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, February 08, 2011 5:49 am
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>

Once again, he ended the USMB instead of reinforcing it when he enter office 
and passed the 1988 bill when he left office, then he died, sorry he as no 
angle. REAGAN KILLED THE METRICATION OF US.


On Feb 8, 2011, Paul Trusten <[email protected]> wrote:

 
I  did not raise any aspect of partisan politics with regard to U.S. 
metrication.  Partisanism is poison to the goal, and I have no need to discuss 
anything else about the Reagan era.  I only stated the facts of the times. The 
USMB was impotent and rudderless,  Mr. Reagan did not support outright repeal 
of the MCA (which would have crippled the goal beyond recognition today), he 
did support voluntary conversion to metric as stated in his letter to USMB 
Chairman Polk, and did sign into law the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act 
of 1988, which made metric the Nation's preferred measurement system.  The 
latter goes far beyond the effect of any presidential order, since it is the 
Congress, not the President, who has the power to fix the standard of weights 
and measures for the United States (U.S. Consitution, Article I, Section 8).   
The old line that Reagan was the killer of U.S. metrication is a myth.
 
Paul Trusten, R.Ph. , Vice President
U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
www.metric.org
[email protected]
+1(432)528-8824
 
 

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: U.S. Metric Association
Sent: 06 February, 2011 22:00
Subject: [USMA:49792] Re: Ronald Reagan--NOT an enemy of U.S. metrication

Please stop right there, do you even recognize the dates? 1981 his first year 
in office, 1988 his last year in office. Oh yea, he showed lots of of support?! 
Where was the Executive Orders anytime of his 8 years in office? All he did was 
give rich tax cuts will building a deficit. 


On Feb 6, 2011, Paul Trusten <[email protected]> wrote:


On this 100th anniversary of the birth of U.S. President Ronald W. Reagan, I 
had the opportunity to answer a comment sent to USMA that repeated what I call 
the U.S. metricationist's dogma that President Reagan "stopped" or "derailed" 
metrication in America because he ended funding for the U.S. Metric Board.
 
The commenter wrote: 
 
I wonder how many people remember that it was President Reagan who took us 
> off a metric progress road.  Our country is now in a very uncompetitive 
> position because of this wrong-headed decision.  I doubt that this legacy 
> will be highlighted in the 100th birthday tribute.   We are reaping what 
> was sown in 1982.
 
I replied:
 
You may be surprised to learn that, contrary to the dogma that has been 
widely circulated among American metrication supporters, Mr. Reagan did much 
to keep America on a metrication path.

In 1982, U.S. metrication was not doing well at all . The goal had very few 
champions in government or business and did not enjoy the necessary 
widespread support from the U.S. public.  The U.S. Metric Board (USMB), 
established by the Metric Coversion Act of 1975 (MCA) merely to "coordinate 
the increasing use of the metric system in the U.S." and to do that without 
any compulsory powers, was itself divided in its commitment to the goal (see 
http://www.metric.org/laws/usmb.html#disbanding ). It even reported to 
Congress in 1981 that it lacked a mandate to continue its work. In his 
search for ways to reduce federal spending, President Reagan identified the 
USMB as a government body that was moribund, and eliminated its funding, for 
which he has been vilified by metrication supporters. But at this same time, 
he rejected a proposal by former U.S. Representative Eldon Rudd (R-AZ) to 
repeal the MCA. He later strengthened the MCA in 1988 by signing into law 
legislation that declared the metric system to be the Nation's preferred 
system of measurement for trade and commerce 
(http://www.metric.org/laws/metric-conv.html).
 
Paul Trusten, R.Ph. , Vice President
U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
www.metric.org
[email protected]
+1(432)528-8824

Reply via email to