2011 Feb 12
Pat,
Yes. It is interesting but 12 years out of date.
Are you going to refute it? Or is it too old so a refutation will do
no good?
It's main point is cost. But there is no base for the cost it says
is high.
Robert Bushnell
----------------------------------------------
On Feb 12, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Pat Naughtin wrote:
Dear All,
I have not met with this (1999) anti-metric argument previously.
You might find it of interest.
See http://www.zaimoni.com/George/Metrics.htm
Cheers,
Pat Naughtin LCAMS
Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see http://
metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008
Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has
helped thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the
modern metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that
they now save thousands each year when buying, processing, or
selling for their businesses. Pat provides services and resources
for many different trades, crafts, and professions for commercial,
industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government,
Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK,
and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com for more
metrication information, contact Pat at
[email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication
matters' newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/
newsletter to subscribe.
