This could be an attempt by Westinghouse to get commercial tie-in for the
site.  On the other hand, the words "Buncefield fuel depot, 2005" or
"Flixborough disaster" are whispered into the ear of the British minister,
the Westinghouse design might well be discounted.  For the benefit of US
readers, Buncefield was a fuel deport that went up in flames on Boxing Day
2005.  The cause was a failed gauge and a failed safety switch which allowed
petrol to leak out of the vent pipe - see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buncefield_fire .  Flixborough was caused when
a temporary repair job failed (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flixborough_disaster).  Using non-standard
equipment instead of standard equipment is an invitation for problems.

 

British civil servants (most of whom are "jobsworthys" - ie "I can't do that
- it is more than my job is worth") would almost certainly reject such
plans, but ministers are often susceptible to "disinformation".  However,
the word "nuclear" has a bad name in the UK, and any minister who is making
such decisions on political grounds will certainly have to deal with the
anti-nuclear lobby.

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of John Frewen-Lord
Sent: 28 February 2011 17:54
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:49950] Re: Nuclear inches

 

As all construction in the UK is metric, I don't see how Westinghouse is
going to be able to design a structure in imperial units.  All UK
engineering codes are metric (and limit states as well, which inherently are
metric), and no engineer in the UK can design to these codes using
non-metric calculations.

 

As far as I can see, Westinghouse are going to have to design the structures
housing these reactors in metric units.

 

John F-L

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Michael <mailto:[email protected]>  Payne 

To: U.S. Metric <mailto:[email protected]>  Association 

Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 5:40 PM

Subject: [USMA:49949] Re: Nuclear inches

 

This is very interesting and shows the trouble all US companies face using
two systems, this could be another Mars orbiter type of disaster years down
the road if completed as designed. A friend told me South Africa is
soliciting bids for another nuclear reactor, Westinghouse is also bidding on
that. I'll keep you up to date on what transpires. 

 

Mike Payne

 

On 25/02/2011, at 14:23 , Pat Naughtin wrote:





Dear All, 

 

http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/ElectricPower/8583252 

 

Cheers,

 



Pat Naughtin LCAMS

Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html

Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY 

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,

Geelong, Australia

Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

 

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands
each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat
provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and
professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in
Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian
Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the
UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com
<http://www.metricationmatters.com/>  for more metrication information,
contact Pat at [email protected] or to get the free
'Metrication matters' newsletter go to:
http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.

 

 

Reply via email to