Bruce,
Suffice it to say that I disagree with much of what you have written
here. But if that is your opinion and understanding of the facts, so be it.
On your more salient point, I'm sure that the local officials would be
using locomotive engines if they could get them close enough to run the
cables. Locomotive engines are merely diesel generators on motor-driven
wheels.
Jim
On 2011-03-15 1445, [email protected] wrote:
I understand it completely, nukes is bad in every form, there is no
safely way of handling it or storing it. Japanese authority is reporting
radiation level is currently 100 time above safety levels, and
most-likely is higher that. God help the one forced to clean up the
mess, sadly the Japan waited to ask for help when they knew they were in
trouble, President Obama stated giving help from day one of the nuke
problem, but now, putting everyone in more danger. If the cooling pumps
only needed power why not use locomotive power as generators, the pumps
must be more damage then stated.
Bruce E. Arkwright, Jr
Erie PA
Linux and Metric User and Enforcer
Id put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I
hope we dont have to wait til oil and coal run out before we tackle
that. I wish I had a few more years left. -- Thomas Edison
--
James R. Frysinger
632 Stony Point Mountain Road
Doyle, TN 38559-3030
(C) 931.212.0267
(H) 931.657.3107
(F) 931.657.3108
