Hi John,

 

I made a small contribution - the bit showing the various languages.  I will
certainly add your reference - it is very useful.

 

Regards

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of John M. Steele
Sent: 18 April 2011 13:52
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:50368] Re: Alfa Romeo Readies a Stirring Stateside Return

 

Yes, that might be useful too.  Are you the author?  It would be useful if
the article points out that on dual unit speedometers in the US, FMVSS101
requires km/h (upper case is allowed) and does not permit kph, or any
variant of it.  Therefore a driver sees kph only in car reviews and not on
his dash, adding confusion.  This was addressed in my note to the author.  

(NOTE: If you are the author and need a reference, see USMA laws page for
FMVSS101 reference.)

 

My personal goal for the year is to stamp out the kilo-pico-hour.  Because
of dashboard confusion and FMVSS101, I am thinking automotive writers may be
the best place to apply leverage (in addition to storm reporters, after
rolling over the Natiuonal Hurricane Center).

 

  _____  

From: Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, April 18, 2011 8:04:55 AM
Subject: RE: [USMA:50366] Alfa Romeo Readies a Stirring Stateside Return

You could also point him to the Wikipedia article at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilometres_per_hour.

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of John M. Steele
Sent: 18 April 2011 12:16
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:50366] Alfa Romeo Readies a Stirring Stateside Return

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704662604576257300108686920.ht
ml?mod=googlenews_wsj

 

The author of this car review expresses strong advocacy for the metric
system in the body of his review, but then goes on to use the dreaded "kph"
and mostly Customary specs for the vehicle.  He does express strong support
for liters per 100 kilometers as a fuel economy measure.

 

I have sent a note thanking him for the metric support, pointing out that
"km/h" is the correct symbol, not "kph," and suggesting one way to show
metric support is to use metric specs or at least dual units for all specs
in his reviews.

Reply via email to