JM Steele, Pat Naughtin & all Sirs:
In my note/reply to Victor on May 11, I wrote:

"Pi RE: Growth, Aging & Decay RE: Time‏"
To see messages related to this one, group messages by conversation.







 

5/11/11 


 



 Brij Bhushan Vij 





 


Brij Bhushan Vij
[email protected]

To calendar listserv










From:
Brij Bhushan Vij ([email protected])

Sent:
Wed 5/11/11 4:13 PM

To: 
calendar listserv ([email protected])











Victor, Sepp sirs:
>.....very true!
NO wonder. Measure of Geometry via Arc-angle [and Pi] is related to TIME. 
Pi is a point on NUMBER LINE that lies between 3.1415...and 3.1416; which can 
be equated to 100000/31831, which repeats all by itself at 5244th decimal 
point. 
I was checking on THIS aspect of *yet another value for Pi* that fits almost 
every aspect:
Pi value = 104348/33215 gives Radian =57* 17’ 44”.8062253229577951              
                                                 
Brij's (Rationalised)Pi =100000/31831 give Radian =57* 17’ 
44”.880000000000000000000000009657               
206264.88 Arc-seconds = 57* 17’ 44”.88
Approximation of 'Chord-length' of the circle to 'length of circumference' has 
so far defied mathematicians/calendar makers alike.
Recently, March 14th was declared as Pi-day, which is 74th day after (January 
01):http://www.brijvij.com/bb_fbUNday-week.pdf
Regards,
Brij Bhushan Vij 
Wednesday, 20110511H16:18(decimal)EST"

 
>.....Pi value 355/113 or 104348/33215 and the earlier 22/7 or underroot 10....
As in my previous arguments and elucidations, I expressed my Pi value to be 
closer to ABSOLUTE and repeating ALL by itself at 5244th decimal point, I work 
to show
*how close to actual is my RESULT* when compared to these above values:
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piphilology
It is interesting, learning:  The Indiana Pi Bill is the popular name for bill 
#246 of the 1897 sitting of the Indiana General Assembly, one of the most 
famous attempts to establish scientific truth by legislative fiat. 
22/7 =3.1428571428571428571428571428571 give RADIAN 
=57*.27272727272727272727272727273 i.e. 57* 16’ 
21”.818181818181818181818181827554
SqrRoot 10 =3.1622776601683793319988935444327 give RADIAN 
=56*.920997883030827975980083799802 i.e. 56* 55’ 
15”.592378910980713528301679286722
355/113 =3.1415929203539823008849557522124 give RADIAN 
=57*.295774647887323943661971830986 i.e. 57* 17’ 
44”.788732394366197183098591549296
104348/33215 =3.1415926539214210447087159415927 give RADIAN = 
57*.295779507034154943075094874854=57*17’44”.806225322957795070341549473685 
Against these values, my result seem to be the BEST100000/31831 
=3.141591530269234394144073387 5781 is possibly *SIMPLEST, BEST & EASY to 
memorise* which give RADIAN =57* 17’ 44”.880000000000000000000000009657 i.e. 
57*.2958 for ALL calculations!  
            On my examining the value during 1973-74, I had the value run into 
Delhi University Campus, Computer Center and published its value to lie between 
TWO FRACTIONS, and later got this copyrighted as the “POSSIBLE ABSOLUTE VALUE”. 
Let this be the YET ANOTHER VALUE till I am proved WRONG in my argument 
advanced during discussions with USMA & Calndr-L members on list (see 
archives’). Mathematicians may in due course see reason in my pointing to THIS 
value being *absolute & unique*.

My regards, sirs
Brij Bhushan Vij 
Monday (Memorial Day), 20110530H00:74(decimal)EST 
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda 
The Astronomical Poem (revised number of days in any month)
"30 days has July,September, 
April, June, November and December 
all the rest have 31 except February which has 29 
except on years divisible evenly by 4; 
except when YEAR divisible by 128 and 3200 -
as long as you remember that 
"October (meaning 8) is the 10th month; and 
December (meaning 10) is the 12th BUT has 30 days & ONE 
OUTSIDE of calendar-format"
Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30 
Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30 
(365th day of Year is World Day)
******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendaar***** 
"Koi bhi cheshtha vayarth nahin hoti, purshaarth karne mein hai"
My Profile - http://www.brijvij.com/bbv_2col-vipBrief.pdf
Author had NO interaction with The World Calendar Association
except via Media & Organisations to who I contributed for A 
Possible World Calendar, since 1971. 
HOME PAGE: http://www.brijvij.com/ 
Contact via E-mail: [email protected] 


 


Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 10:12:51 -0700
From: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:50536] Re: Value of pi
To: [email protected]






Weren't we all.  Most scientific calculators have a "pi" key, but if you are 
forced to use a simple calculator, 355/113 is a good enough approximation for 
virtually any engineering work (better than 0.1 ppm).  Write it as a classic 
long division problem and you will never forget it.
 
Much less mnemonic, but 104348/33215 agrees with the pi key on my 10 digit 
calculator.  If I subtract them, the calculator gives zero.





From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, May 29, 2011 6:45:54 AM
Subject: [USMA:50533] Value of pi





On a more serious note, I was brought up in my early education to believe that 
pi was equal to 22/7 and that all circles had a radius that was a multiple or 
sub-multiple of 7.


These days, if I want a quick value for a circular area I use diameter squared 
multiplied by 0.8, where 0.8 is an approximation of pi/4 (pi/4 = 0.7854). As an 
example, my garden rainwater tank is 3 metres in diameter and it is 2 metres up 
to the overflow pipe. My estimate of its volume, done in my head, goes 
something like this:


3 metres squared = 9 square metres. 9 square metres times 0.8 = 7.2 square 
metres = area of the base of the tank (say) 7 square metres. 7 square metres 
times 2 = 14 cubic metres or 14 000 litres. When I bought this tank it was 
specified to hold 13 500 litres so it looks like I got a good deal.


Cheers,


Pat Naughtin
Geelong Australia









                                          

Reply via email to