If metric is "preferred," one wonders why meat and random weight produce must 
be 
sold by weight, measured in pounds, and bottled beer must be labelled in 
Customary measure, and why standard-size packages require both customary and 
metric net contents.  I believe it is called hypocrisy and lip service.  With 
no 
metrication plan to back up "preferred," it means absolutely nothing.  
Congress' 
insistence that metrication is voluntary is why ALL Federal agencies must 
continue to cater to those who won't metricate. (The fact that they make life a 
nuisance for those who have metricated is totally ignored.)




________________________________
From: Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Cc: USMA Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, June 29, 2011 2:53:01 AM
Subject: [USMA:50777] Lacking elegance


From: Pat Naughtin [mailto:[email protected]
>Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 11:51 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: U.S. Metric Association
>Subject: Re: [USMA:50742] Re: MyPlate
>
>Dear Stan,
>
>
>The metric system is already the official system of measurement for the USA 
>for 
>all measurements as it has been since 1893 when the old pre-metric measuring 
>words were defined in terms of metric system units. Sadly however, a lot of 
>people choose to hide this fact as you point out is the case in the meat 
>industry. It's hard to know why they do this grovelling to folk who are so 
>ill-informed about the honesty and simplicity of the metric system. Grovelling 
>by the government of the USA certainly lacks elegance.
>
>
>You might be interested in some extremely simple advice I sent to Barack Obama 
>and Joe Biden when they were first elected. 
>See http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/NaughtinToObamaBiden.pdf 
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>Pat Naughtin
>Geelong, Australia

On 2011/06/29, at 12:01 , Stan Doore wrote:
>
>I know Pat.  But Congress has NOT mandated metric only be used. Thanks.
>>Stan

Dear Stan, 

What you say is true but hasn't your government not only made the metric system 
the basis for all measurement in the USA (in 1893 and again in 1959), it has 
also made (mandated) the metric system the "preferred" measurement system for 
the USA.

This means, surely, that any government Department can be pointedly asked why 
they are grovelling to ill-informed people as the EPA has done with the MPGe 
("miles per gallon equivalent" from another thread). Why has the EPA chosen to 
create an entirely newly defined group of measuring words instead of simply 
using the metric system units that are simpler and more honest, and probably 
already better known. They still have to devise an education strategy to 
introduce the public to the MPGe, which I understand was based on a chat with a 
focus group.

I say again that watching the government of the USA grovelling to ill-informed 
people lacks a great deal of elegance when viewed from outside the USA.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia




On 2011/06/26, at 13:29 , Stan Doore wrote:
>
>
>
>                You are correct.  Until The US Congress mandates that metric 
>appears first on ALL labels like the rest of the world, then metric will 
>continue to flounder.  Metric must become the official unit of measurement.
>Regards,  Stan Doore

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin LCAMS
Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see 
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY 
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, 
and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. 
See http://www.metricationmatters.com/ to subscribe.

Reply via email to