Pat/  sirs:
>.....would encourage the publication of books in our own country. It would 
>render it, in some measure, necessary that all books should be printed in 
>America. 
Was this the political issue/or commercial issue that made America suffer so 
long  'draining her man-power and/or economy'? How unfortunate? 
The more the delay the more CHAOS and economic dependence, without adopting Le 
Systeme International d'Unites (SI).
SIncerly,
Brij Bhushan Vij 
Friday, 20110701H18:08(decimal)EST
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda 
The Astronomical Poem (revised number of days in any month)
"30 days has July,September, 
April, June, November and December 
all the rest have 31 except February which has 29 
except on years divisible evenly by 4; 
except when YEAR divisible by 128 and 3200 -
as long as you remember that 
"October (meaning 8) is the 10th month; and 
December (meaning 10) is the 12th BUT has 30 days & ONE 
OUTSIDE of calendar-format"
Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30 
Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30 
(365th day of Year is World Day)
******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendaar***** 
"Koi bhi cheshtha vayarth nahin hoti, purshaarth karne mein hai"
My Profile - http://www.brijvij.com/bbv_2col-vipBrief.pdf
Author had NO interaction with The World Calendar Association
except via Media & Organisations to who I contributed for A 
Possible World Calendar, since 1971. 
HOME PAGE: http://www.brijvij.com/ 
Contact via E-mail: [email protected] 
 



Subject: [USMA:50801] Re: Metres Versus Meters when Programming
From: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 07:40:43 +1000
CC: [email protected]
To: [email protected]


Dear Jim,


You are quite right to point out that I was a bit rough on Noah Webster.


But he did write the following in An Essay on the Necessity, Advantages, and 
Practicality of Reforming the Mode of Spelling (1789):


But a capital advantage of this reform in these states would be, that it would 
make a difference between the English orthography and the American. This will 
startle those who have not attended to the subject; but I am confident that 
such an event is an object of vast political consequence.


For, the alteration, however small, would encourage the publication of books in 
our own country. It would render it, in some measure, necessary that all books 
should be printed in America. The English would never copy our orthography for 
their own use; and consequently the same impressions of books would not answer 
for both countries. The inhabitants of the present generation would read the 
English impressions; but posterity, being taught a different spelling, would 
prefer the American orthography.




Cheers,


Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia


On 2011/07/01, at 08:59 , James Frysinger wrote:

Dear Pat,

I don't suppose you would describe your viewpoints here as being more 
ethnocentric than objective, would you? "Corrupt"? "Own commercial interests"? 
"Paranoia"? Grin.

Jim

-- 
James R. Frysinger
632 Stony Point Mountain Road
Doyle, TN 38559-3030

(C) 931.212.0267
(H) 931.657.3107
(F) 931.657.3108

On 2011-06-30 16:55, Pat Naughtin wrote:

Dear Martin,



Other than the article you have already referred to at:

http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/Spelling_metre_or_meter.pdf I

don't think that I can help you. When Noah Webster decided to corrupt

the spelling of metre in the 1700s and early 1800s, he did so for his

own commercial reasons as well as to meet the paranoia of the USA at

that time.



Webster's success with his deception is now so widespread that it has

become part of the culture of the USA and, for over 200 years, it

restricted the population of the USA from accessing many valuable

references from all other English speaking nations — no matter how

superior these "/foreign/" books might be. It was only a little lie at

the time but it has grown mightily.



I hope you don't mind but I have copied your email on to the USMA

maillist for their comments — their thoughts are always valuable.



Cheers,



Pat Naughtin

Geelong, Australia



On 2011/07/01, at 04:02 , Martin Bromley wrote:




Hello Pat,





My company runs a site at http://www.degreedays.net/ that generates a


specialist type of temperature data called degree days. We're in the


process of building an API (Application Programming Interface), which


will give other programmers a way to get data out of our system


without doing it manually through the website interface.





In our API we need to give programmers access to several measurements


of distance, like the elevation of a weather station above sea level.


I had decided that we should use the metres unit for these


measurements. That was an easy decision.





What was not such an easy decision was deciding whether to spell it


"metres" or "meters"...





I'm guessing you're not a programmer so I shall give you just a little


background. If we use "metres" in our API, we're forcing all


programmers that use our API to type "metres" in various places


throughout their code. And the thing with programming is that US


spellings are the norm. Programmers around the world are used to


typing color instead of colour and center instead of centre. It's like


a standard of sorts.





A couple of links that discuss this, for if you're interested:





http://stackoverflow.com/questions/157807/gb-english-or-us-english


http://drabasablog.net/archives/post-133.html





So the en_US convention for programming would encourage us to use


"meters" in our API (which is essentially a domain-specific language


for programmers). And that is tempting.





But we are providing a scientific kind of data, so it seems to me that


it's important to be scientific in our measurements. And "meters" just


doesn't feel scientific.





I came across your excellent PDF on the metres/meters debate and I


found it very useful. It helped give me the confidence to make the


decision to settle on "metres", shunning the en_US convention for


software programs.





Many thanks for putting that information together and writing it in


such a compelling way.





Fingers crossed we don't change our mind tomorrow or get shouted at by


angry Americans after we launch this API and they're wondering why on


earth we spelt meters "wrong".





Please don't feel the need to reply to this... Through running our


Degree Days.net site I know what it's like when random strangers email


one long tales out of the blue, when one doesn't really have time to


respond. I just wanted to say thanks.





Best regards,





Martin Bromley


http://www.degreedays.net/



Pat Naughtin LCAMS

Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see

http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html

Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,

Geelong, Australia

Phone: 61 3 5241 2008



Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped

thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern

metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save

thousands each year when buying, processing, or selling for their

businesses. Pat provides services and resources for many different

trades, crafts, and professions for commercial, industrial and

government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's

clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the

metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See

http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information,

contact Pat at [email protected] or to get the free

'Metrication matters' newsletter go to:

http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.





Pat Naughtin LCAMS
Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, see 
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY 
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See 
http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat 
at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication matters' 
newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.

                                          

Reply via email to