Mr. Tom L. Bené, Chair
American Beverage Association
1101 Sixteenth St. NW
Washington, DC 20036

2011-07-20

Dear Mr. Bené, 

For almost 40 years, U. S. consumers have joined with beverage makers in "going 
metric."  Store shelves are full with 500 mL, 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L sizes in soft 
drink and bottled water product sizes, and  most people recognize the size of 
one liter or two liters of volume at a glance. Even in advertising, retailers 
post the metric sizes of beverages exclusively,  on shelf tags and electronic 
marquees.  Yet, not all beverages sold to the American public are packaged in 
such round metric sizes. Why hasn't the American beverage industry evolved 
toward completing the job?

Congress in 1988 declared the metric system to be the "preferred system of 
measurement" for U.S. trade.  One might say that Congress caught up with the 
beverage industry in establishing that preference. I wish to suggest that the 
ABA support the trend, and discuss among its member companies a transition to 
predominantly metric sizes . For example, the 237 mL size could become 250 mL, 
and the 591 mL size would rise to an even 600 mL.  Combined with a consumer 
education program, wider use of the milliliter and the liter would make 
comparing sizes easier.  It would also that calculations of large amounts of 
product would also be simplified. 

The U.S. Metric Association (USMA) is a non-profit, national organization 
founded in 1916.  USMA advocates U.S. conversion to the metric system of 
measurement as the Nation's primary measurement standard.  Examples of other 
metric U.S. consumer products may be found on our Web site at 
www.metric.org/products/


Thank you very much for your kind attention.


SIncerely,

Paul R. Trusten
Registered Pharmacist
Vice President and Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
www.metric.org
[email protected]
+1(432)528-7724







 

Reply via email to