Bill, There is a "generic" e-mail for the Stylebook to submit questions/comments (no attachments permitted). I have used it in the past but to no avail (I thought I had pretty good backup for the points in my e-mail a year or so ago).
If others wish to submit comments by snail-mail, the three individuals named in the article are the Stylebook editors, and the address is: The Associated Press 450 W 33rd St New York NY 10001 Of course, the USMA archive indicates we have been flogging the AP for incorrect usage for at least a decade to no avail, so my letters may not accomplish much either. I've taken my best shot. On to a previously scheduled joust with the next windmill. ________________________________ From: Bill Hooper <[email protected]> To: John M. Steele <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, July 30, 2011 4:10:33 PM Subject: Re: [USMA:50933] Re: AP Stylebook: now we have a name. On Jul 30 , at 1:35 PM, John M. Steele wrote: Bill, >Are you possibly confusing my letter with Carleton's e-mailed comment to the >Post? >I snail-mailed my letter to the three co-authors at AP Headquarters because >they >don't accept e-mail attachments. My analysis of the AP Stylebook metric >errors >was a 3-page Word document (attached to a message here a week or 10 days ago). Confusion? ME? Well, yes, I sure may have confused the two authors of the two USMA emails. But in any case, thanks for your reply. I never even found email addresses for them, much less had any opportunity to send attachments. However, I recall finding USPS addresses and I may do as you have done, send snail mail msgs. Thanks. Bill Hooper 1810 mm tall Fernandina Beach, Florida, USA ========================== SImplification Begins With SI. ==========================
