I have seen both kPa and bars used in different countries in Europe for car
tyre pressures.  Germany uses kPa while the bar is an alternative to psi in
the UK.

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of G. Stanley Doore
Sent: 26 August 2011 20:34
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:51022] RE: Millimetres of Mercury & Millibars of air
pressure.

 

Why not use the pascal instead of millibars?  The numbers are the same
although there is a shift in the decimal place.
Regards, Stan Doore 

On Aug 25, 2011 2:40 AM, "Martin Vlietstra" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> 
> 
> The SI Brouchure (8th edition) has a section "Non-SI units accepted for
use
> with the SI, and units based on fundamental constants" which can be found
at
> http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/chapter4/4-1.html. This leads into
> Table 8 of the brochure where the use of "mm Hg" for the measurement of
> blood pressure is specifically catalogued as being a permitted deviation
> from "pure SI". The underlying reason is that this unit of measure is used
> across the entire globe. If the Australian medical profession were to go
it
> alone and use kPa for measuring blood pressure, and Australian medical
staff
> were dispatched to help in a disaster zone, they would have problems
> communicating with their colleagues from other countries.
> 
> 
> 
> Air pressure is a different thing - bars convert to kPa by moving a
decimal
> point. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of John Candido
> Sent: 25 August 2011 03:15
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:51014] Millimetres of Mercury & Millibars of air pressure.
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, I live in Australia and we are predominantly a metric nation. However,
> we have not been consistent with things such as the measurement of blood
> pressure in medicine and air pressure in meteorology. The measurement of
> blood pressure in millimetres of mercury instead of kPa (kilopascals) is a
> prime example of this inconsistency. A normal blood pressure reading for
an
> adult in millimetres of mercury is 120 on 80, and its equivalent in kPa is
> 16 on 10. In addition, what about the measurement of air pressure in
> millibars, which is the current method? Will this be converted to
> hectopascals of air pressure in the future? Thank you. 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours, John Candido. 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to