Congress passed a law back in 1995/1996 saying the Feds could not FORCE metric 
on the State highway departments.  The States all reverted to Customary and the 
Feds finally gave up, both on highway construction (which I doubt visitors 
would notice) and signage.
 
The 2009 MUTCD has moved all metric dimensions on highway signs to an appendix 
and removed all sample metric messages.  I don't think they are "illegal" but 
they are no longer explicitly given by examples (Standard Highway Signs, SHS, 
has not yet been updated to follow suit.)
 
In the period when the MUTCD was showing metriuc sign messages, several States 
passed laws clarifying that they did not use the metric.

--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Parker Willey Jr. <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Parker Willey Jr. <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:51091] Question about metric highway requirements
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, September 7, 2011, 2:44 AM






I have a question about metric highway requirements.

In this memorandum:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/contracts/1108metr.cfm

  Apparently, all state highway agencies have changed their internal 
requirements to use only colonial units and not use metric at all.

There seems to be a clarification probably to state highway departments.  It 
seems to say there is no requirement to use or to not use metric units.  Then, 
I assume that a state highway department can use metric in it's designs if it 
wants to and still qualify for federal funding.

Is that what I am seeing?

I believe that when foreigners come to the US and see our peculiar colonial 
highway measures, they then will not buy our products as they will probably be 
not dimensioned in metric units.

How can we push the highway departments to get on the metric system?  Any ideas?

...Parker

Reply via email to