but this is mostly about how the media fiddles with numbers.
 
The AP item on Yahoo news and this paper report it as a 16 foot (4.88 meter) 
snake that consumed a 76 pound (34.47 kilogram) deer.  Another paper said the 
snake was between 16 and 18 ft, so not too precise and a bit of decimal dust in 
the numbers above.  
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Huge-python-found-in-Florida-had-eaten-a-deer-2241725.php
 
Obviously, no one in Florida is of foreign origin and everyone understands 
Customary, so may as well strip out the metric.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/8479673-418/deer-eating16-foot-python-killed-in-florida.html
 
Of course, readers in the UK can't understand it unless the deer is converted 
to stones (5st 6lb) and no metric.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2054968/Peckish-python-16ft-long-snake-South-Florida-Everglades-adult-deer-stomach.html
(caution, this last link has some gross photos)
 
I'm sure the Canadian and Australian press would have used metric but had the 
good taste not to cover the story.

Reply via email to