You may have as many 100 mL things as fit in your one quart/one liter clear 
plastic Ziplock bag (approximately 9.46 or 10) AND they can all be the same 
thing, but must be separate containers of no more than 100 mL.
 
Some sites say 100 g is OK too if labelled in mass.  They don't consider 
density.  They also consider ONLY the declared size, not whether it is half 
empty.

--- On Sun, 11/6/11, James Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote:


From: James Frysinger <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:51300] Re: 100 ml size for Airport Security
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, November 6, 2011, 6:55 PM


Just thinking out loud here. Would TSA permit TWO toothpaste tubes (or 
bottles of cologne, etc.), each under 100 mL but totaling more than 100 mL?

Jim

-- 
James R. Frysinger
632 Stony Point Mountain Road
Doyle, TN 38559-3030

(C) 931.212.0267
(H) 931.657.3107
(F) 931.657.3108

On 2011-11-06 17:32, John M. Steele wrote:
> I'm surprised manufacturers haven't gone to 100 mL travel sizes. Most
> "trial" sizes are MUCH smaller, 1 fl oz or so, and not enough for the
> trip. An opportunity is being missed here.
>
> --- On *Sun, 11/6/11, Michael Payne /<[email protected]>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: Michael Payne <[email protected]>
>     Subject: [USMA:51298] 100 ml size for Airport Security
>     To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>     Date: Sunday, November 6, 2011, 5:42 PM
>
>     In the picture, there are two tubes of toothpaste, one is a 100 mL,
>     the max size allowed by the TSA, purchased in Europe, the other is a
>     US made toothpaste labelled as 4,6 oz (130 g). They have the same
>     diameter, the 100 mL is slightly longer, yet you can get thru
>     security with the former and not the latter. This is not helped by
>     the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) stating the volume
>     limit is 3 oz when they mean 3 fl oz. And then allowing anything up
>     to 3,4 fl oz volume to go thru security because it is the equivalent
>     (roughly) of 100 mL.
>
>     Now if we could just persuade Colgate Palmolive to label in volume
>     instead of mass you could pack this in your carry on suitcase, which
>     you cannot do now. Well, at least not for the one labelled 4,6 fl oz.
>
>     Mike Payne
>
>

Reply via email to