I think those remarks are uncalled for.  However, there are few shining 
examples of members of either party standing up and trying to metricate the 
country (at least any that had measurable effect).
 
I will point out that George H. W. Bush was a Republican and the President who 
signed EO 12770.  Also he would have been the President who signed into law the 
FPLA amendments requiring metric in 1992, although they did not take effect 
until 1994.
 
I will concede since then, Clinton, G. W. Bush, and Obama have failed to do 
anything notable for metrication, as has Congress; both parties have not done 
much.  In fact Congress significantly undermined metrication in 1995 with 
restrictions on metrication in Federal byuildings and highway construction.
 
Had the following Presidents made real efforts to enforce EO 12770 on their 
administrations and agencies, we would be a lot more metric.

--- On Wed, 1/11/12, Harry Wyeth <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Harry Wyeth <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:51402] Re: What are candidates stand on weights and measures?
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2012, 9:36 AM



Are you kidding?  A GOP candidate on converting to a socialist, left-wing, 
European style, progressive, coercive, government-imposed, un-American system 
used by enemy countries like China and Iraq and Iran and North Korea and Cuba 
and Venezuela (besides everyone else)?  What are the chances?

HARRY WYETH


On 1/10/12 2328:28, Parker Willey Jr. wrote: 




Hi:

Does anyone know or think they know how any of the Republican or other 
candidates feel about metric conversion?

...Parker


Reply via email to