I cannot speak for Australia, but I know that the UK and Canada earmarked 
construction as one of the lead industries in paving the way for full metric 
conversion.

I was in Canada at the time, in the 1970s, and sat (albeit briefly) on one of 
the construction sector’s conversion committees, which were co-ordinated by the 
federal government in Ottawa. I remember that the industry was in favour of 
conversion because of the cost savings, but I cannot remember specific figures.

However, the 15% figure is quite likely typical. In the late 1980s, when I was 
the consulting QS on Toronto General Hospital, we hired a firm of architects to 
re-measure the entire 100 000 m² complex. We debated whether to do it in 
imperial or metric, as the original drawings (inaccurate though they were) were 
all in imperial, some going back to the beginning of the 20th century. That 
debate ended when the architects quoted fees 15% higher in imperial than doing 
everything in metric. We did it in metric.

John F-L

From: Paul Rittman 
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 6:14 PM
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Subject: [USMA:51572] Specifics on metrication increasing profits to Australian 
construction industry

I know that I read somewhere on Pat Naughtin's site (Metrication Matters) that 
when Australia converted to the metric system, its construction firms realized 
increases of 15% on their (net) profits.  

I'd like some more info on this. I seem to recall this was in teh context of 
not having nearly as many cuts of wood and what not, that were unusable, 
because of mistakes made by wrong calculations when using imperial measures. I 
did a search for "Australia construction" and didn't find anything on his site. 

I'd like to get as specific as possible on this, because construction is one of 
the areas where people say converting to metric (in the US) would be as 
difficult as any other sector of the economy.

Does anyone recall which article on Pat's site discussed this, or does anyone 
have any other links that might address this issue?
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4903 - Release Date: 03/29/12

Reply via email to