Hi John M. Steele, John Altounji, Michael Payne,
Thank you for all the answers. Looked at the articles similar  to
articles written in soil journal a few years ago in the USA. I know in
engineering notation numbers expressed in powers of 10^3-9 is common
but not in life sciences. For acre-feet I have seen cubic meters and
some dekameter references. Gives me an idea range of use.






On 4/18/12, Kilopascal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Believe it or not, India:
>
> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2002-12-15/chandigarh/27307472_1_water-table-sweet-water-water-requirement
>
> http://books.google.com/books?id=UXqD2w_77asC&pg=PA52&lpg=PA52&dq=%22hectare-metre%22&source=bl&ots=Ib_OmFMTML&sig=cY9t5YtNTLOZ-ynZnONddeBriKY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A1uPT8f2EaXs2QWG8ayMBQ&ved=0CFcQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=%22hectare-metre%22&f=false
>
> http://mastec.nic.in/waterresource.htm
>
> It makes sense that when India went metric they just took what the British
> left and created hodge-podges from that.  acre foot thus hectare metre.
>
>
> [USMA:51607] Re: Hectare- meter
> John Altounji
> Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:05:52 -0700
>
> I second Mike.  Cubic meter is the one in use.
>
> John Altounji
>
> One size does not fit all.
> Social promotion ruined Education.
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Michael Payne
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:46 PM
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:51606] Re: Hectare- meter
>
> I've only seen large water volumes expressed in other countries as m3 (1000
> L), sometimes referred to as "cumsecs" in newspapers and on the news for
> cubic meters per second when referring to flood water flow or water going
> over a dam wall.
>
> Mike Payne
> On 17/04/2012, at 21:13 , John M. Steele wrote:
>
>
> Well, it is 10^4 cubic meters, a break from the usual powers of 1000.
>
> To avoid long numbers (and large counting words, I would prefer to use one
> of
> 1 dam³ = 10^3 m³
> 1 hm³ = 10^6 m³
> 1 km³ = 10^9 m³
> according to magnitude
>
> SAE TSB003 recommends the cubic dekameter for amounts of (irrigation) water
> that in Customary would be expressed in acre-feet (1 acre-foot = 1.23348
> dam³), and does not permit the hectare-meter.  I don't know whether the
> hectare-meter is used in other countries.  It's symbol would be confusing
> without a middle dot, ha·m.
>
> --- On Tue, 4/17/12, Edward Schlesinger  wrote:
>
> From: Edward Schlesinger
> Subject: [USMA:51604] Hectare- meter
> To: "U.S. Metric Association"
> Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2012, 7:47 PM
> Hi all;
> In figuring out or reporting volume capacity is  hectare-meter
> redundant instead of cubic meter?
> --
> Sincerely,
> Edward B.
>
>
>


-- 
Sincerely,
Edward B.

Reply via email to