I noticed today in the grocery store that Dannon, a leading producer (with Yoplait) of yogurt, has introduced a new metricated container for its Greek yogurt. Greek yogurt seems to be the "in thing" these days. It has a thicker consistency than regular commercial yogurt, has about half the sugar, and twice the protein.

USC-based yogurt containers are either 4 oz. or 6 oz. This new Dannon container is 150 grams, marked also 5.3 oz. Obviously, the packaging is metric-based, with a USC conversion added, not the other way around.

This, together with other observations, leads me to emphasize my new theme: "complete our metric conversion." I think that we need to stop talking about the US as being one of only two or three countries that are not metric.

In fact, the US is already about half metric. What we need to do, I think, is to talk about "completing" the metrication to achieve its full benefits. We are in the same situation as Canada, Britain, and several other countries in being on the way to complete metrication. We are just in different stages.

The US is certainly moving toward more metric use, even though it may not be so obvious as on road signs. But the grocery story is a powerful component of metrication. Consumers here by metricated wine, metricated pills, metricated soft drinks, and many other commodities. You don't hear consumers objecting; it just happens. This type of conversion actually has benefits. It doesn't rouse the anti-metric faction.

I don't think that it does our cause any service to keep describing the US as "not metric." It would make our point better to bring our fellow citizens to a realization that we are already half way there. We just need to complete the process to reap the full benefits and cost savings.

That is why I have a problem with the phraseology of the metric petition that is being talked about here. It stresses the rationality of the metric system, being easier to use and teach, once learned. While this is certainly true, I think that our cause would be better served by stressing the economic benefits: international commerce, saving companies the not- insignificant costs of maintaining dual inventories, the cost in time and money of teaching our students two systems of measurement. Idealism is fine, but it doesn't sell as well in a political environment. It is dollars that count there.

Reply via email to