The vast majority of pumps have electronic displays, read credit cards etc.  I 
very much suspect that already have a metric switch or can be patched in 
software.  The same major brands exist in the US and Canada (and other 
countries) and they already know how to do metric.

The businesses that already converted had to absorb whatever costs there were 
(but also saw much larger benefits).  I stongly suspect if the giovernment 
agreed to cover the costs, the costs would be driven WAY up and there would be 
a 
lot of corruption.  If the choices are pay the cost of go out of business, 
companies will find the most cost-effective way.




________________________________
From: Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, January 14, 2013 5:36:24 PM
Subject: [USMA:52175] RE: USMA to the President: suggested general approach to 
U.S. metrication


Hi Paul,
 
I was concerned to see that you advised that “costs should be borne where they 
fell”.  The British made that mistake nearly 50 years ago.  The South African 
Government on the other hand picked up the tab where the cost was related to a 
statutory requirement (eg changing a petrol pump from gallons to litres).
 
Regards
 
Martin Vlietstra
 
From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Paul Trusten
Sent: 14 January 2013 19:10
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:52174] USMA to the President: suggested general approach to U.S. 
metrication
 
The following was sent to President Obama as a general suggestion, as a message 
to the President's Office of Public Engagement, The President's Office of Jobs 
and Competitiveness, and also on an organizational page (i.e., suggested being 
submitted by an organization) . No lunch for me today!
 
Attached is a pdf copy of the general approach suggestion. 
 
Dear Mr. President,
The whitehouse.gov "We The People" petition urging U.S. changeover to the 
international metric system as the Nation's measurement standard is about to 
garner its 30,000th signature since its posting Dec. 31, surpassing your 
attention threshold by 5,000, and we are still counting! It is time for us to 
start making tangible plans for America to go metric.
On behalf of the U.S. Metric Association, I wish to suggest the following 
general approach to meeting the goal of a metric America. This approach is our 
modern revision of the Commerce Department recommendations summarized in its 
1971 report, "A Metric America: A Decision Whose Time has Come," by Daniel V. 
DeSimone, a report mandated by the Metric Study Act of 1968.
SUGGESTED GENERAL APPROACH TO U.S. METRICATION
U.S. Metric Association
January 14, 2013
 
1) In accordance with Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, the 
Congress shall set a goal of changing the Nation's standard of weights and 
measures to the International System of Units (the SI, or the modern metric 
system). This process is commonly termed metrication.
2)This goal shall be achieved through a cooordinated national program.
3)To assign the responsibility for effecting this change, the Congress shall 
empower a central coordinating body responsive to all sectors of American 
society.
4)Each sector shall develop its own detailed plans and timetables for the 
switch 
to the SI standard.
5)PRIOR to the start of the changeover, the Nation shall commit itself to 
educating all of its citizens--all students as well as the public at large--to 
think in metric terms.
6) In order to increase efficiency and minimize the overall costs to U.S. 
society, the general rule shall be that any changeover costs shall "lie where 
they fall."
7)The Congress, after deciding upon a plan for the Nation, shall establish a 
target date 10 years ahead, by which date the U.S. will have become 
predominantly, if not exclusively, metric.
8) The change shall be accomplished in the spirit of a national compact for 
U.S. 
metrication--that is, a firm national commitment to the change,not only by the 
government but also by the individual sectors of our society. Once the change 
has started, confidence must be high there shall be no general reversion to a 
pre-metric standard. 

 
SIncerely,
 
Paul Trusten
Registered Pharmacist
Vice President, U.S. Metric Association
www.metric.org
[email protected]
+1(432)528-7724

Reply via email to