Something like 18-20 years ago, I remember reading a Detroit News article
about several southern states attempting to do something similar, but as a
group.  The article highlighted the fact that their plan was to metricate
the roads & fuel, although the overall tone seemed to imply that there was
more they wanted to accomplish.  Obviously nothing happened to this
project, but it would have been a nice start.

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:17 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> So, the states still have the option of putting up metric-only road signs
> for speed limits and distances? Sure hope so!
>
> -- Ezra
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Paul Trusten" <[email protected]>
> *To: *"U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:35:00 AM
> *Subject: *[USMA:52213] RE: current status of the Hawaii metric bill,
> H.B. 36
>
>
> This is a metrication bill, signs and gas included(grin). But, yes, a
> statement on the 1988 act should be added to the bill. Thanks, Phil.
>
> Paul Trusten, Reg. Pharmacist
> Vice President
> U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
> Midland, Texas USA
> www.metric.org
> +1(432)528-7724
> [email protected]
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:15, Phil Chernack <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It would be nice if the bill made mention of the fact that Congress has
> already declared SI to be the preferred system of measurement for the U.S.
> Also, it would be nice if there was a mention of highway signs and gasoline
> sales.
>
> Phil
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:31 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm going to try to gain more support for this bill. It's one that could
>> set the country on a faster path to usage of SI
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> * From: * Paul Trusten <[email protected]>;
>> * To: * U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>;
>> * Subject: * [USMA:52207] current status of the Hawaii metric bill, H.B.
>> 36
>> * Sent: * Tue, Jan 22, 2013 9:00:44 AM
>>
>>
>> http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=36&year=2013
>>
>
>

Reply via email to