1) Monroney sticker requires CO2 in grams per mile.  It is normally not used in 
advertising here.  It is largely a waste of space as it can be accurately 
caklculated from fuel economy data:
*44 g of CO2 requires 12 g of C in fuel
*Both diesel and gasoline are about 85% carbon w/w
*Density of gasoline around 0.74 kg/L, disel 0.84 kg/L
(the 2nd and 3rd assumptions can be replaced with better data if available)

2) Evidently



________________________________
From: Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, April 24, 2013 4:57:56 PM
Subject: [USMA:52692] RE: Oops: Imperial or Customary?


Was this written by a journalist?  If so
 
1.       They probably do not know how to convert g/km to oz/mile (is that what 
is used in the US)
2.       They are probably unaware that the UK gallon is larger than the US 
gallon.
 
If on the other hand it was written by an advertising person, it might well 
have 
been convenient to “forget” about the difference between the UK and the US 
gallon.
 
From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
John M. Steele
Sent: 24 April 2013 15:48
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:52689] Oops: Imperial or Customary?
 
US website "borrows" report from UK website on how green the Ford Fiesta 
(diesel) is:
http://usdailyvoice.com/ford-fiesta-hyped-by-u-k-website-as-top-green-car-of-the-year-1958.html#comment-395

"According to official (metric system) figures, the 2013 Ford Fiesta’s 
emissions 
are now at only 87 g/km carbon dioxide. This would be for the 1.6-liter diesel 
variant, which is also capable of 85.6 miles per gallon in the combined cycle,"
 
The CO2 figures make it look like the mpg is proabaly Imperial, and Googling 
for 
the original UK source, they use the same figures which are unlikely to be 
based 
on the US gallon:
http://www.thegreencarwebsite.co.uk/blog/index.php/2013/04/23/top-green-car-the-ford-fiesta-the-green-piece/

 
So he manages to change British "litre" to American "liter" but not to fix the 
gallons.  He should have gone with L/100 km. 

Reply via email to