Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 4:35 am
Subject: [USMA:52876] RE: Metric Flag
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Cc: "'U.S. Metric Association'" <[email protected]>
>
The ratio 10:14 (or rather 5:7) differs from sqrt(2) by a factor of 1.02%
Other approximations are
· 17:12 (deviates from sqrt(2) by 0.17%
· 99:70 (deviates from sqrt(2) by 0.0051%)
It really depends on how accurate you want to go and the practicalities of keeping to the required accuracy. I do not think that in the real world it is practical to define a flag as having sides in the ratio 99:70, though 17:12 seems OK.
From: Henschel Mark [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 05 June 2013 02:19
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: Re: [USMA:52864] RE: Metric Flag
Not exactly.
Metric paper is the ratio of one to the square root of two, or one to radical two (1:1.414...)
I suppose 7:10 would work as an approximation.
IF you like ratios, explore the Renard series of preferred numbers. Louis Sokol did a lot of work on this topic and wrote some interesting papers about Renard numbers.
Mark
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 6:03 am
> Subject: [USMA:52864] RE: Metric Flag
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>
> > And a flag ratio of 7:10 - the ratio of A4 paper?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf
> > Of Pierre Abbat
> > Sent: 04 June 2013 10:31
> > To: U.S. Metric Association
> > Subject: [USMA:52862] RE: Metric Flag
> >
> > On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 07:59:20 Martin Vlietstra wrote:
> > > I know that some flags do have text - this seems to have been
> > a trends
> > > in the 19th century. Historically the flag was an emblem
> > that was
> > > recognisable without text.
> >
> > How about the quarter meridian divided into ten equal parts?
> >
> > Pierre
> > --
> > li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
> > li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci
> >
> >
