My first reactions to the Draft are:

1.  Understanding the Draft requires a knowledge of physics and mathematics 
beyond a usual high school education.

2.  Although this level of complication may be necessary to base SI entirely on 
defined numerical values of fundamental constants, greatly simplified 
explanations will be necessary to teach SI to elementary and secondary students.

2.  The historical facts of the evolution of  cgs units, mks units, and mksa 
units into SI units belongs in appendices, as in previous editions of the 
Brochure, not in the main text of the Brochure.

3.  The letters "SI" are a "symbol" as are s, m. K, symbols for the SI 
Prefixes, etc., not "abbreviations."

4.  A new name and symbol for the kilogram (kg) is needed to emphasize that the 
kilogram is *the* coherent unit of mass in SI. 

Eugene Mechtly

Reply via email to