Jim (Frysinger),

Do the “new” Common Core Standards award equal value to (1) SI Units of 
Measurement and to (2) unit outside the SI which are now *defined* as awkward 
multiples of SI Units?

We agree that this teaching of both (of "buggy-whip units” in addition to SI 
Units) is a disaster for the education of youths in the US with respect to 
competition with youths educated in other countries.

Years ago, I printed a copy of the original “Common Core State Standards” but I 
have yet to examine the “new” Common Core Standards in detail.  I begin that 
examination later this morning.

Gene Mechtly.
 
On May 15, 2014, at 8:16 PM, James <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've just taken a look at the background on the development of the new Common 
> Core Standards for education in the United States.
> 
> Contrary to myth, this is not a federal program being "shoved down the 
> throats" of the states and their citizens. Rather, representatives from 48 
> states devised the Common Core; 44 states have adopted it so far. In fact, 
> looking at a list of the participants, I found -- in addition to states' 
> representatives -- many professional national organizations but not a single 
> one from the federal government. If any of the latter were there, I missed 
> them.
> 
> Contrary to another myth, the Common Core provides no curricula. It is up to 
> each state, local education system, and individual teacher to devise 
> curricula to attain the specified standard knowledge for each grade and 
> within each domain.
> 
> Due to my military background, which involved many moves from one state to 
> another, I applaud a commonality among states in the standards for each grade 
> level. This avoids having the same standard being applied in one grade in one 
> state but a different grade in a different state. The latter greatly impedes 
> the education of students who move from one state to another during their 
> school years. That risks missing a concept entirely while being taught 
> another one for the second year in a row.
> 
> The focus of my detailed inspection was on the Mathematics Standards, in 
> particular the domain of "Measurement and Data". That is due to my interest 
> in metrology. That domain is specifically covered in grades Kindergarten 
> through five. Of course, it is the underlying basis for parallel domains and 
> for domains addressed for grades 6 through 12.
> 
> I found the sequence of standards in this domain to be utterly logical and I 
> deem them to be attainable. Unlike some early "new math" reforms, this one is 
> not what I would call "fuzzy math" nor does it contain esoteric abstract 
> concepts. Rather, it is well grounded with hands-on learning. (In math 
> education, the objects used to provide such grounding are called 
> "manipulatives".)
> 
> The "Measurement and Data" domain can be seen, broken down by grade level, at
>       http://www.corestandards.org/read-the-standards/
> See also:
>       http://www.corestandards.org/other-resources/key-shifts-in-mathematics/
> 
> My one concern is that we are still teaching two "systems" of units -- metric 
> and non-metric. On a positive note, though, the metric system is included in 
> all of those six levels (K-5). This is a greater presence of SI in education 
> standards than I have seen before. Lorelle Young and I spoke with a 
> representative of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) 
> years ago to encourage them to do this. We were not very successful.
> 
> The good news is, the organization(s) behind this consider it a work in 
> progress. There is still time, once the US gives up its buggy-whip units of 
> measurement, to streamline the standards by omitting them and thus provide 
> more time for learning metric units. One cautionary note, however -- the 
> concept of common and vulgar (non-decimal) fractions must still be taught!
> 
> As a reminder, I looked specifically at the "Measurements and Data" domain. I 
> did not look (very deeply) at the other domains in the Mathematics Standards.
> 
> Jim Frysinger
> 
> -- 
> James R. Frysinger
> 632 Stoney Point Mountain Road
> Doyle TN 38559-3030
> 
> (C) 931.212.0267
> (H) 931.657.3107
> (F) 931.657.3108
> 

Reply via email to