Mr Steele. I totally agree. I think you hit the nail on the head with
that very insightful comment.

----- Message from "John M. Steele" <[email protected]> ---------
    Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 03:08:00 -0700
    From: "John M. Steele" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "John M. Steele" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:53986] Re: State by State Metrication
      To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
      Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

The bigger problem is "50 States = 50 Ways."  Eventually, the Feds would
have to step in to restore some order.  However, I have no problem using
it temporarily as a "cattle prod" to get the Feds moving on metrication;
nothing else has worked.

 
                  On Monday, June 16, 2014 9:58 PM, "mechtly, eugene a"
<[email protected]> wrote:

 

                     On Jun 16, 2014, at 8:33 PM,  wrote:

The problem with state by state legislation is that some states
already *require*
              units outside the SI for Unit Pricing, while even the
current FPLA is silent of the units of measurement that may or must be
used in Unit Pricing.
               

               Eugene Mechtly


-------------------------
               FROM: [email protected]
[[email protected]] on behalf of [email protected]
[[email protected]]
SENT: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:55 AM
TO: U.S. Metric Association
SUBJECT: [USMA:53983] State by State Metrication
 
                               Yes indeed, Thank you Don. 
With 110 names on our list, one would think that those 110 people
probably live in at least ten or perhaps even twenty or so states. We
have state metrication legislation pending in Hawaii (HB36). We have
state metrication legislation pending in Oregon (LC44). Please
consider introducing state metrication legislation in your state too
so we can give momentum to this trend. I know that some may argue
against this state-by-state strategy, and I agree that a federal
mandate would be preferable, but a federal mandate seems unlikely in
light of the current gridlock in Congress. Even though a
state-by-state metrication legislation strategy may not be ideal, at
least it sends a message that some Americans in some states want
metrication. Who knows? It just might work. I say we give it a try.
What say you? Please consider introducing metrication legislation in
YOUR state. 

----- Message from "Ressel, Howard R (DOT)" <[email protected]>
---------
    Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:18:35 +0000
    From: "Ressel, Howard R (DOT)" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:53982] Re: Rejoining USMA
      To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>

Probably a good time to thank Don for coordinating this list for all
these years, I think we sometimes forget he is the quite guy keeping
it going and thanks to Colorado State for hosting.
                   
                   
                  I agree, unless we hit some sort of server limit to
the number of users, the more the merrier even if they just listen in.
                   
                   

FROM: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] ON
BEHALF OF Harold_Potsdamer
SENT: Sunday, June 15, 2014 12:25 AM
TO: U.S. Metric Association
SUBJECT: [USMA:53973] Re: Rejoining USMA

                   
                                                         But how many
actually post?  Why sign up if you have no intention to post? 

                                        

                                       Do you drop people off who
don’t post a message after a fixed amount of time?

                                        

                                        

                                        

                                        


             


FROM:Hillger,Donald[1]

                                             SENT: Sunday, 2014-06-15
00:05

                                             TO:U.S. Metric
Association[2]

                                             SUBJECT: [USMA:53970]
Re: Rejoining USMA

                                          

                                       About 110 names.
                     

FROM:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] ON
BEHALF OF [email protected]
SENT: Saturday, June 14, 2014 21:55
TO: U.S. Metric Association
SUBJECT: [USMA:53969] Re: Rejoining USMA

                     
                    Welcome back! I am curious. Approximately how
many are on the USMA list?

----- Message from Bill Hooper <[email protected]> ---------
    Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 23:04:09 -0400
    From: Bill Hooper <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:53968] Rejoining USMA
      To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>

Have been away for some time and am now rejoining the USMA list.
Bill

----- End message from Bill Hooper <[email protected]> -----
                                         David
Pearl www.MetricPioneer.com[3] 503-428-4917

----- End message from "Ressel, Howard R (DOT)"
<[email protected]> -----
 
                David Pearl www.MetricPioneer.com[3] 503-428-4917

 

----- End message from "John M. Steele" <[email protected]> -----



Links:
------
[1] mailto:[email protected]
[2] mailto:[email protected]
[3] http://www.metricpioneer.com/
David Pearl www.MetricPioneer.com 503-428-4917

Reply via email to