In scientific and technical disciplines consistency of terminology helps 
enormously. After many years of doing technical writing I am convinced of this 
more than ever. 

It is therefore not pedantism or picayunism to decry the use of angstrom, 
micron, etc. Consistent use of units in all their aspects is definitely a plus. 

In informal conversation one can and should do as one likes; in all other cases 
careful consistency definitely pays off. :-) 

-- Ezra 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Martin Vlietstra" <[email protected]> 
To: "USMA" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 11:10:09 PM 
Subject: [USMA:54151] RE: Teaching Metric Units of Measurement 

Eugene is quite right, a person should be consistent in how they write and 
pronounce words, but that does not mean that there is only one "right" way 
to do things. For example, even though this is a US site, I consistently 
write in British English. I know that there are a few differences, but I do 
not believe that this in any way detracts from or enhances what I write. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of mechtly, eugene a 
Sent: 15 July 2014 03:53 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Subject: [USMA:54150] Teaching Metric Units of Measurement 

Although some readers in this forum are indifferent to standards for 
spelling and sounding the words associated with metric units of measurement, 
the persons who actually teach metric units in schools or in private 
settings, can not be ambivalent in their choices of how to write and speak 
metric words. 

They would be perceived as silly if they alternated from one spelling to the 
other, and from one sounding to the other in trying to be impartial. 

What standards, if any, should they follow? Their own personal preferences, 
standards recommended in NIST documents, examples in the Oxford English 
Dictionary, practices exampled in the BIPM Brochure on SI, recommendations 
in the IEEE-ASTM SI 10, or what? 

Whatever their choices, they impart their choices to their "students" by 
example, whether "good" or "bad" in our respective minds. 

Eugene Mechtly 



Reply via email to