If it’s the Associated Press it is always their policy to dumb down the 
measurements.

 

Carleton

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Michael Payne
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 16:27
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:54617] Metric drone legislation

 

Reading the proposed rules, I see the limits are actually 25 kg and 2 kg for 
Unmanned air vehicles, aka drones. Figures have been rounded by the media to 55 
lbs and 4,4 lbs.

 

Mike

 




FAA Unveils Long Awaited Small Drone Draft Regulation


The FAA unveiled its highly anticipated proposed regulation for the commercial 
use of small drones weighing less than 55 pounds yesterday, coinciding with the 
release of a Presidential memorandum setting privacy guidelines for federal 
agencies that use unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). Under the FAA’s proposed 
rule, which it called a “framework of regulations,” operators would be required 
to fly drones within their unaided line of sight, to a maximum altitude of 500 
feet above ground level and during daylight hours. Flights in airspace sectors 
other than Class G uncontrolled airspace would require local ATC permission to 
maintain a buffer between manned and unmanned aircraft. The rule contains a 
“micro UAS option” that would permit more flexible operation in Class G 
airspace for drones weighing 4.4 pounds or less. Significantly, the regulation 
would not require small drone operators to have a pilot certificate. Rather, 
they would need a “newly created FAA unmanned aircraft operator’s permit.” 
Also, the FAA would not require small drones to be certified for airworthiness; 
instead, they must be maintained in a safe condition for flight. The FAA’s 
conditions must survive a rulemaking process that could take 18 months or 
longer. The agency will accept public comments for 60 days from the date the 
NPRM appears in the Federal Register. “Today’s action does not authorize 
widespread commercial use of unmanned aircraft,” Huerta advised. “That can only 
happen when the rule is final.”

 

Reply via email to