They "fessed up" the next day, starting about 14:52 to tnd of segment.  I found 
the link posted on another site, which is not quite the same as "finding the 
link."
AIH Apr 2/15 - Cindy Gladue Protest, Craig Davidson/Nick Cutter, Listener 
Response: April Fools (Part 2)
|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| AIH Apr 2/15 - Cindy Gladue Protest, Craig Davidson/Nic...Cindy Gladue 
Protest, Craig Davidson/Nick Cutter, Listener Response: April Fools. |
|  |
| View on www.cbc.ca | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

  
      From: Michael Payne <[email protected]>
 To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> 
Cc: USMA <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 4:08 PM
 Subject: [USMA:54680] Re: Troubling agreement
   
Probable! I certainly hope so, I’ll check back in a day or two and see if 
anything has changed. I don’t remember the exact date, but it was the late 90’s 
or 2000 that the US changed to Celsius temperatures for METARS.
Mike

On 03 Apr 2015, at 20:30, John M. Steele <[email protected]> wrote:
I could be wrong, but, honestly, I believe you have been taken in by an April 
Fool's joke.
No diplomat would use an insensitive phrase like "trade irritant."  In 1988, 
Congress proclaimed metric as the preferred measurement system for trade and 
commerce.  A few years ago, we change temperatures in METARs (aviation weather 
reports) to Celsius.  We may metricate slowly (VERY!! slowly) but I find this 
very hard to believe.  Especially since NONE of other trading partners use 
Fahrenheit either.  Keep in mind Mexico is the third country of NAFTA and they 
are arguable more metric than you and speak a foreign language to boot.

      From: Michael Payne <[email protected]>
 To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 7:55 AM
 Subject: [USMA:54678] Re: Troubling agreement
   
Here is the broadcast 
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-wednesday-edition-1.3018322
You can listen to the full broadcast, the item I heard is in part 2: 
temperature harmonisation, An american trade representative tells us why his 
country wants Canada to switch back to Fahrenheit. You can listen to part 2 
only.
Mike Payne
u



On 03 Apr 2015, at 13:19, John M. Steele <[email protected]> wrote:
The International Dairy Foods Association lists several protocols (time and 
temperature) for pasteurisation, including ultra-pasteurised, which can be 
stored at room temperature. The US uses mostly 15 s, 72 °C.  I wonder if the 
difference is merely which protocol is preferred or required. I can't imagine 
we would quibble over whether the temperature is stated in °C or °F as long as 
they were equivalent.
http://www.idfa.org/news-views/media-kits/milk/pasteurization
      From: Michael Payne <[email protected]>
 To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 8:20 AM
 Subject: [USMA:54674] Troubling agreement
   
I just happened to be listening to the CBC news early this morning was half 
asleep but paid more attention when I realized they were discussing an apparent 
agreement for Canada to drop some of it’s metric requirements for trade with 
the USA (NAFTA?), they talked about pasteurisation temperatures as an example, 
from the sound of the conversation this was being pushed on Canada by the 
Washington based trade negotiator, the presenter seemed a little aghast that 
this could happen, 

I’ve not had time to google this apart from a cursory “Canada to drop metric 
system nafta” query which didn’t seem to bring up anything. Later on I’ll be 
able to spend a bit more time researching this, but I’m really amazed that this 
is being stuffed down the throats of the Canadians.

Mike Payne



   



   



  

Reply via email to